Has Floyd BEATEN Anybody As GOOD AS TIM BRADLEY???

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MONGOOSE66
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2011
    • 7739
    • 1,609
    • 620
    • 29,199

    #231
    Originally posted by icha
    so who do you think wins canelo vs bradley??
    there is your answer.... sçhit canelo even beats pac...
    after canelo beats lara there wont be no denial on this...
    Canelo too big for Bradley and Pac, bot Pac and Bradley should be fighting at 140. See the size of Pac's thighs? Looked more like an elite squatter than boxing thighs. Canelo only came down for the money and the size advantage. He came up short cause he was too drained. He belongs at 160 but won't cause he has no size advantage.

    Comment

    • 4Corners
      Nothing But Sunshine
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2011
      • 14441
      • 485
      • 83
      • 25,167

      #232
      Originally posted by PorterIsFuture
      I would rank Pac's win over Bradley to that of Floyd over Hatton, slightly better.
      Both were solid at 140, but Bradley had a better resume overall @ LWW. @ 147, both had 1 robbery win (Collazo,Pacquiao) leading up their big fight at WW. But at WW, Bradley has wins over Provo & JMM, while Hatton only has 1 over Malignaggi.

      So yea, Pac's win is slightly better than Floyd's vs Hatton. Put that to rest in this thread.
      I wouldn't rank Hatton beating Collazo in the same robbery category as Pac-Bradley 1.

      Comment

      • turkas
        Undisputed Champion
        • Mar 2010
        • 1483
        • 67
        • 54
        • 7,646

        #233
        Originally posted by Still Burner
        This thread back fired in a major way. Well done to everyone involved.
        I am just pissed TS called me Flowmo when I merely enjoy watching Floyd, but don't always root for him.

        When he did that I realized his strategy is simply say whatever you, fact be damned, and then either ignore or completely blow off responses that say otherwise. It's like I am watch fox news or something.

        Comment

        • turkas
          Undisputed Champion
          • Mar 2010
          • 1483
          • 67
          • 54
          • 7,646

          #234
          Originally posted by PorterIsFuture
          I would rank Pac's win over Bradley to that of Floyd over Hatton, slightly better.
          Both were solid at 140, but Bradley had a better resume overall @ LWW. @ 147, both had 1 robbery win (Collazo,Pacquiao) leading up their big fight at WW. But at WW, Bradley has wins over Provo & JMM, while Hatton only has 1 over Malignaggi.

          So yea, Pac's win is slightly better than Floyd's vs Hatton. Put that to rest in this thread.
          I see it the same same, but I rank them about equal because Hatton was the legit guy at 140. FWIW the Paule fight was at 140 not 147, but I hear ya.

          Comment

          • Showtime..
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2014
            • 3888
            • 141
            • 200
            • 4,673

            #235
            Originally posted by 4Corners
            I wouldn't rank Hatton beating Collazo in the same robbery category as Pac-Bradley 1.
            Granted, but Pac would throw Collazo in a ditch in 3 rounds back in 2007.
            Bradley got beat by the #1 fighter, while Hatton struggled with a guy who was never that good in the first place. (Granted he was bigger, but the previous point still stands).

            Comment

            • Ragnar Lothbrok
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 6329
              • 532
              • 573
              • 7,422

              #236
              http://******.craveonline.com/ratings/pound-for-pound

              #1 floyd
              #2 ward
              #3 Bradley

              but yea bradley sucks and is nothing special.

              what do we make of fighters #4 through #10 since bradley is a crap fighter now according the the butt hurt floyd fans in this thread?

              Comment

              • turkas
                Undisputed Champion
                • Mar 2010
                • 1483
                • 67
                • 54
                • 7,646

                #237
                Originally posted by Ragnar Lothbrok
                http://******.craveonline.com/ratings/pound-for-pound

                #1 floyd
                #2 ward
                #3 Bradley

                but yea bradley sucks and is nothing special.

                what do we make of fighters #4 through #10 since bradley is a crap fighter now according the the butt hurt floyd fans in this thread?
                Anyone who says Bradley is a crap fighter is an idiot, simple as that.

                He's a very good fight, not elite, but very good. I imagine he bounces back after this loss.

                Comment

                • 4Corners
                  Nothing But Sunshine
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 14441
                  • 485
                  • 83
                  • 25,167

                  #238
                  Originally posted by PorterIsFuture
                  Granted, but Pac would throw Collazo in a ditch in 3 rounds back in 2007.
                  Bradley got beat by the #1 fighter, while Hatton struggled with a guy who was never that good in the first place. (Granted he was bigger, but the previous point still stands).
                  But what would Bradley do to Collazo in 2006.....that would be an interesting fight. Collazo was a lot better then ever given credit for back then.

                  Comment

                  • prolific
                    Contender
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 120
                    • 5
                    • 0
                    • 6,179

                    #239
                    Originally posted by Zano-24
                    Floyd Mayweather was ranked #1 at 154 after he defeated Oscar De La Hoya. This much I do remember. This means that De La Hoya had to have been ranked #1 at 154 when Floyd fought him.
                    I recall Felix sturm kicking dlh's ass not too long before the Floyd fight. He then got has ass beat by Hopkins. He also got beat by mosely. From a "prime" stand point he lost 2 of his last 4 before Floyd. 1 of 4 if there was no corruption in boxing.

                    Comment

                    • turkas
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 1483
                      • 67
                      • 54
                      • 7,646

                      #240
                      Originally posted by prolific
                      I recall Felix sturm kicking dlh's ass not too long before the Floyd fight. He then got has ass beat by Hopkins. He also got beat by mosely. From a "prime" stand point he lost 2 of his last 4 before Floyd. 1 of 4 if there was no corruption in boxing.
                      I mean if we are talking about bad scores, most people think he beat Mosley in the second fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP