Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Has Floyd BEATEN Anybody As GOOD AS TIM BRADLEY???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by icha View Post
    so who do you think wins canelo vs bradley??
    there is your answer.... sçhit canelo even beats pac...
    after canelo beats lara there wont be no denial on this...
    Canelo too big for Bradley and Pac, bot Pac and Bradley should be fighting at 140. See the size of Pac's thighs? Looked more like an elite squatter than boxing thighs. Canelo only came down for the money and the size advantage. He came up short cause he was too drained. He belongs at 160 but won't cause he has no size advantage.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by PorterIsFuture View Post
      I would rank Pac's win over Bradley to that of Floyd over Hatton, slightly better.
      Both were solid at 140, but Bradley had a better resume overall @ LWW. @ 147, both had 1 robbery win (Collazo,Pacquiao) leading up their big fight at WW. But at WW, Bradley has wins over Provo & JMM, while Hatton only has 1 over Malignaggi.

      So yea, Pac's win is slightly better than Floyd's vs Hatton. Put that to rest in this thread.
      I wouldn't rank Hatton beating Collazo in the same robbery category as Pac-Bradley 1.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Still Burner View Post
        This thread back fired in a major way. Well done to everyone involved.
        I am just pissed TS called me Flowmo when I merely enjoy watching Floyd, but don't always root for him.

        When he did that I realized his strategy is simply say whatever you, fact be damned, and then either ignore or completely blow off responses that say otherwise. It's like I am watch fox news or something.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by PorterIsFuture View Post
          I would rank Pac's win over Bradley to that of Floyd over Hatton, slightly better.
          Both were solid at 140, but Bradley had a better resume overall @ LWW. @ 147, both had 1 robbery win (Collazo,Pacquiao) leading up their big fight at WW. But at WW, Bradley has wins over Provo & JMM, while Hatton only has 1 over Malignaggi.

          So yea, Pac's win is slightly better than Floyd's vs Hatton. Put that to rest in this thread.
          I see it the same same, but I rank them about equal because Hatton was the legit guy at 140. FWIW the Paule fight was at 140 not 147, but I hear ya.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by 4Corners View Post
            I wouldn't rank Hatton beating Collazo in the same robbery category as Pac-Bradley 1.
            Granted, but Pac would throw Collazo in a ditch in 3 rounds back in 2007.
            Bradley got beat by the #1 fighter, while Hatton struggled with a guy who was never that good in the first place. (Granted he was bigger, but the previous point still stands).

            Comment


            • http://******.craveonline.com/ratings/pound-for-pound

              #1 floyd
              #2 ward
              #3 Bradley

              but yea bradley sucks and is nothing special.

              what do we make of fighters #4 through #10 since bradley is a crap fighter now according the the butt hurt floyd fans in this thread?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Ragnar Lothbrok View Post
                http://******.craveonline.com/ratings/pound-for-pound

                #1 floyd
                #2 ward
                #3 Bradley

                but yea bradley sucks and is nothing special.

                what do we make of fighters #4 through #10 since bradley is a crap fighter now according the the butt hurt floyd fans in this thread?
                Anyone who says Bradley is a crap fighter is an idiot, simple as that.

                He's a very good fight, not elite, but very good. I imagine he bounces back after this loss.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by PorterIsFuture View Post
                  Granted, but Pac would throw Collazo in a ditch in 3 rounds back in 2007.
                  Bradley got beat by the #1 fighter, while Hatton struggled with a guy who was never that good in the first place. (Granted he was bigger, but the previous point still stands).
                  But what would Bradley do to Collazo in 2006.....that would be an interesting fight. Collazo was a lot better then ever given credit for back then.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Zano-24 View Post
                    Floyd Mayweather was ranked #1 at 154 after he defeated Oscar De La Hoya. This much I do remember. This means that De La Hoya had to have been ranked #1 at 154 when Floyd fought him.
                    I recall Felix sturm kicking dlh's ass not too long before the Floyd fight. He then got has ass beat by Hopkins. He also got beat by mosely. From a "prime" stand point he lost 2 of his last 4 before Floyd. 1 of 4 if there was no corruption in boxing.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by prolific View Post
                      I recall Felix sturm kicking dlh's ass not too long before the Floyd fight. He then got has ass beat by Hopkins. He also got beat by mosely. From a "prime" stand point he lost 2 of his last 4 before Floyd. 1 of 4 if there was no corruption in boxing.
                      I mean if we are talking about bad scores, most people think he beat Mosley in the second fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP