As much as I can't stand Bob Arum, this silent takeover by Golden Boy should make people nervous.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Bob Arum Smells Backdoor Handshake in MGM Fiasco
Collapse
-
-
For Arum being ***** MGM should make a big Mayweather-Maidana banner open up over the ring during the fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kiddoe View PostNah... Venue doesn't sell the fight. The fight sells the fight.
+ I'd like to see some fights at Caesars once again. Many a great memory...
True.
But Mayweather was involved in the top two highest grossing fights of all time. At the MGM Grand.
His last 8 fights have been held there. Four of those in May.
If ole Bob didn't want any competition at all for the venue, maybe he could have held the fight at Thomas and Mack. Or Dallas Stadium. Or the freaking imaginary stadium that he was supposed to build.
My mirth over this whole thing isn't a Manny vs Mayweather thing, of who is the biggest swinging dick in terms of drawing power.
It's Bob losing his shit, and there being 6 threads about on NSB.Last edited by Sweet Pea 50; 04-10-2014, 07:19 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostAs much as I can't stand Bob Arum, this silent takeover by Golden Boy should make people nervous.
While one side weakening and being forced to the table essentially would be good short run most likely, long run that is not good unless another group comes to take over for the one that falls off.
Really the ideal solution is a third group becomes powerful, because with 2 groups they will just go at it but with 3 it gives another option and neither group can afford to not work with the third group because if either group gets a strangle hold on that relationship the balance of power is forever shifted.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostIt does worry me, I believe competition leads to advance and the best possible product while a monopoly just leads to getting stale.
While one side weakening and being forced to the table essentially would be good short run most likely, long run that is not good unless another group comes to take over for the one that falls off.
Really the ideal solution is a third group becomes powerful, because with 2 groups they will just go at it but with 3 it gives another option and neither group can afford to not work with the third group because if either group gets a strangle hold on that relationship the balance of power is forever shifted.
Comment
Comment