Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Roach: Since Bradley Can't Punch, He Can Kick Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by vman075 View Post
    What a dumb ****ing comment. Did you read what I wrote, I said one was worse than the other. At no point did I even come remotely close to saying what happened to Pacquiao was a good thing. It's like me saying getting shot in the head is worse than getting shot in the stomach and you commenting "so you trying to tell me getting shot in the stomach is a good thing?"
    But as I can tell by your sig your a Bradley fan so even though I said nothing bad about him you just had to jump in to defend him.
    Actually I did read the second half of your post and thought about posting an acknowledgement to that end but I decide not to do so. I'm actually glad I didn't in hindsight as I found your retort amusing. Not removing any fault on my part mind you, I still find your post pretty funny though.

    Anyways, Bradley went on to beat the guy that KO'd Pac cold despite the devastating brain damage that he sustained from the Provo fight....6 months after he had that fight....4 months after the preliminary side-effects of the concussion subsided while Pac took an entire year off before entering the ring again. Obviously someone thought the one punch KO was slightly more severe than the concussion. Just saying......it is what it is and the reality of what transpired contradicts your sentiments.

    Comment


    • #52
      Bradley via flying headbutt

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by drenlou View Post
        I think i need to break it down for bias pac fans..... pac vs sanchez=war,pac vs barerra 1= war,pac vs morales 1,2,3=war,pac vs larios= war,pac vs marquez 1,2,3,4=war,pac vs cotto= war,pac vs margarito=war,now who the hell has bradley fought in a war besides provo??its not rocket science to know pac has more miles on his body then tim....if you argue the fact your a dumb *******,and i wont debate with a *******...period
        Originally posted by drenlou View Post
        So pacquaio didnt sustain damage in all his wars??? Cmon man
        First, I'm 100% not a "bias pac fan" bc the number one criteria for that is you have to be a pac fan, which Im not really (I don't dislike him, he just isnt a favorite of mine).
        Second, and this one is mainly due to the comment of your I quoted, I didn't say he ultimately didn't have more miles on him. My comment was directed more toward when you said "So the marquez knockout probably aged pacquaio 40 years," when someone said that the Provodnikov fight aged Bradley 10 years. My comment was arguing that in each of their one respective fights Bradley took more damage. As far as careers go, obviously Pac has been in more wars, he also has double the fights so career wise, yes he has more miles on him

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by mathed View Post
          Actually I did read the second half of your post and thought about posting an acknowledgement to that end but I decide not to do so. I'm actually glad I didn't in hindsight as I found your retort amusing. Not removing any fault on my part mind you, I still find your post pretty funny though.

          Anyways, Bradley went on to beat the guy that KO'd Pac cold despite the devastating brain damage that he sustained from the Provo fight....6 months after he had that fight....4 months after the preliminary side-effects of the concussion subsided while Pac took an entire year off before entering the ring again. Obviously someone thought the one punch KO was slightly more severe than the concussion. Just saying......it is what it is and the reality of what transpired contradicts your sentiments.
          Fair enough, Bradley came back sooner but I dont think that fight necessarily showed what the Provo fight might have done to him. He was able to fight that fight at a safe distance the whole time (not a knock), so we never really saw him respond to being hit, which would really test his recovery. Marquez caught him good once early and Bradley admitted he was shaken by it. After that he fought well from the outside. As far as Manny I think he could have fought the same fight against Rios (avoiding exchanges) sooner than a year later and it would have been the same. But the same questions went unanswered in that fight bc Rios was never able to really hit him, so we still dont know what the Marquez fight did to him

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Golovkin View Post
            Bradley will suffer in this fight. He will feel the wrath of the Lord through Pacquiao who will be fighting fighting like God has given him the green light and told him to punish Bradley this time. You don't want to see a Christian carry a task that they believe was requested by God. It is a scary sight.

            Pacquiao will look like a psycho on April 12th. Mark my words.

            Comment


            • #56
              Bradley Included: You've Got 6 Days To Pull Excuses Together For Bradley Beatdown!

              No excuses hold water Sunday. No waffling back saying "oh I knew all along Pacquiao would destroy him.... I knew Bradley had no chance; he lost the first fight without question.... I knew Bradley didn't have it..." Just like everyone did with Rios prior to Pacquiao. Like everyone did with Curtis Stevens before Gennady. Pacquiao will train wreck Bradley Saturday and nobody will claim they were behind Timmy. Just like today nobody admits to voting for *****. LOL. The next thing you'll say when Pac blows thru Bradley is, Pac can't handle Provo. Pac can't handle Thurman, or Porter, or Floyd.... Or Pac can't beat Marquez in a 5th fight. Lol.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by vman075 View Post
                Fair enough, Bradley came back sooner but I dont think that fight necessarily showed what the Provo fight might have done to him. He was able to fight that fight at a safe distance the whole time (not a knock), so we never really saw him respond to being hit, which would really test his recovery. Marquez caught him good once early and Bradley admitted he was shaken by it. After that he fought well from the outside. As far as Manny I think he could have fought the same fight against Rios (avoiding exchanges) sooner than a year later and it would have been the same. But the same questions went unanswered in that fight bc Rios was never able to really hit him, so we still dont know what the Marquez fight did to him
                What a ****** discussion. We still don't know what the Marquez fight did too Pac. Gimme a break, Pac looked sensational against Rios. That's why Rios looked so bad. Bradley never looked good against Pacquioa in the first fight, took a beating in the Provo fight he should never have gotten a decision for, and didn't look that great edging out a decision against a drug free, smaller, slower, 40 year old counter puncher in Marquez. So the moral of the story is Bradley looks poor in each of his last three fights, and Manny bounced back from Marquez' Hail Mary, and looked outstanding. Expect the same this Saturday night . Bradley is going to get train wrecked by Manny and we'll be saying Bradley has still never liked good since they stole the belt from Pac, and now Pac has embarrassed Rios & Bradley in consecutive fights; time to man up Marquez and prove your one punch KO was no fluke, which it was. This isn't about being a Pacquiso fan, this is just Boxing reality. Let me add, Bradley was hit by Marquez, Marquez just happened to be free of PED's that fight, due to drug testing, unlike his fight with Manny, where he was noticeably bigger and never had one punch knockout power until he got juiced up, with no drug testing in place.
                Last edited by TLC8; 04-07-2014, 12:07 AM.

                Comment


                • #58
                  The difference between the wars pac has been in and bradley-provo is that pac has never been staggered like bradley was. I mean bradley was literally falling backwards while taking huge shots from a monster like provo.

                  The wars pac were in were against small guys like barrera, morales, and marquez. Except for marquez 4 pac was only stunned but never really badly hurt in any of those fights.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by TLC8 View Post
                    What a ****** discussion. We still don't know what the Marquez fight did too Pac. Gimme a break, Pac looked sensational against Rios. That's why Rios looked so bad. Bradley never looked good against Pacquioa in the first fight, took a beating in the Provo fight he should never have gotten a decision for, and didn't look that great edging out a decision against a drug free, smaller, slower, 40 year old counter puncher in Marquez. So the moral of the story is Bradley looks poor in each of his last three fights, and Manny bounced back from Marquez' Hail Mary, and looked outstanding. Expect the same this Saturday night . Bradley is going to get train wrecked by Manny and we'll be saying Bradley has still never liked good since they stole the belt from Pac, and now Pac has embarrassed Rios & Bradley in consecutive fights; time to man up Marquez and prove your one punch KO was no fluke, which it was. This isn't about being a Pacquiso fan, this is just Boxing reality. Let me add, Bradley was hit by Marquez, Marquez just happened to be free of PED's that fight, due to drug testing, unlike his fight with Manny, where he was noticeably bigger and never had one punch knockout power until he got juiced up, with no drug testing in place.
                    wow .

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by TLC8 View Post
                      What a ****** discussion. We still don't know what the Marquez fight did too Pac. Gimme a break, Pac looked sensational against Rios. That's why Rios looked so bad. Bradley never looked good against Pacquioa in the first fight, took a beating in the Provo fight he should never have gotten a decision for, and didn't look that great edging out a decision against a drug free, smaller, slower, 40 year old counter puncher in Marquez. So the moral of the story is Bradley looks poor in each of his last three fights, and Manny bounced back from Marquez' Hail Mary, and looked outstanding. Expect the same this Saturday night . Bradley is going to get train wrecked by Manny and we'll be saying Bradley has still never liked good since they stole the belt from Pac, and now Pac has embarrassed Rios & Bradley in consecutive fights; time to man up Marquez and prove your one punch KO was no fluke, which it was. This isn't about being a Pacquiso fan, this is just Boxing reality. Let me add, Bradley was hit by Marquez, Marquez just happened to be free of PED's that fight, due to drug testing, unlike his fight with Manny, where he was noticeably bigger and never had one punch knockout power until he got juiced up, with no drug testing in place.
                      Manny looked sensational bc Rios is slow as **** and Manny is extremely fast. Bradley really wasn't hit against Marquez, he caught and buzzed him once early but other than that he boxed very well on the outside. As far as Saturday, contrary to what your implying I actually do think Manny will win, mostly bc I felt he won the first fight by a decent margin. If he goes to make a statement and trys to knock him out, we may see his chin tested really for the first time since Marquez. I just don't think Bradley has the power to really inflict damage though, unless his punch resistance has been compromised. I think both had less miles on them the first time they fought. Well see if the fights in between have any lasting effects. I'd give Pacquiao the edge but a Bradley win wouldn't shock me.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP