You guys do realize Bradley has ZERO head movement right?

[GoldenGloveLove]

I don't really understand the payoff for this kind of trolling.

[Rome-By-Ko]

pac looks worse, his eyes are almost close, oh... wait....

bradley's face is untouched, he didn't even have a black eye.. oh wait....

Pac good doe..

[Rome-By-Ko]

To be fair, judging a fighter by his looks to make your claim that fighter wasn't hit a lot holds about as much water as making a claim that a fighter is shot based on his age.

Some guys hold up well under punishment, others look like Cotto.

Fair enough,but base off the eye test(I saw anyway)it did not look like Pac landed(I should say cleanly)all that often as people are making it out to be..

[SlySlickSmooth]

I think Bradley's head movement got better during the Marquez fight

[LoadedWraps]

Manny is lucky Tim didn't wear socks and rolled his ankles or it might not have been close.

[Sammy2g3]

You do factor this in when you are making an assessment of his skill-set right?

He's a combo puncher, tremendous heart and chin.

When he exchanges he's stationary with his chin up. That's how Provodnikov and Pacquiao were able to rock him on several occassions.

He hasn't faired well against good boxers, he's struggled.

I don't give a s.hit if he keeps winning, but to say stuff like he's a great contender for a Mayweather fight is not realistic.

He's got a huge bulls-eye stationary head and would be eating pot-shots the entire fight.

Just ask Pac, he landed the straight left (bold) AT WILL. (/bold)

And don't even bring up slow as molasses PEDerson, that guy is a slow as molasses (hit and miss) pressure guy.

Seriously? Pac missed so many punches it's a shame.

[Rome-By-Ko]

He landed clean enough, that when he did... it mattered, moreso than any individual punch that Bradley landed. It's clearly a fight of more less effective punches vs less more effective punches. When Pac did land, it equaled or elevated above a significant amount of the work that Bradley may of put in prior. That's why the fight is argued.

Me personally, I thought it was a lot closer than a lot of people had it. I thought the HBO crew were heavily biased, and discredited a lot of Bradleys work and over exaggerated a lot of Pacquiaos work. But based on what I saw, and as a Bradley fan, I thought Pacquiao deserved the nod.

The rematch will hopefully overshadow it anyway.

Fair enough,good post..

[kardsufur]

does Pac have any head movement? compared to bradley that is

[KRITKL]

He landed clean enough, that when he did... it mattered, moreso than any individual punch that Bradley landed. It's clearly a fight of more less effective punches vs less more effective punches. When Pac did land, it equaled or elevated above a significant amount of the work that Bradley may of put in prior. That's why the fight is argued.

Me personally, I thought it was a lot closer than a lot of people had it. I thought the HBO crew were heavily biased, and discredited a lot of Bradleys work and over exaggerated a lot of Pacquiaos work. But based on what I saw, and as a Bradley fan, I thought Pacquiao deserved the nod.

The rematch will hopefully overshadow it anyway.

This is pretty much the how any unbiased, knowledgeable person saw the first fight.

[SeekDaGreat]

I don't really understand the payoff for this kind of trolling.

I don't understand the pay off of having another grown man in your signature. Unless of course you're a 13 year old girl.