Hamed vs. Pac...who wins?and why?

[DIEGO DA HITMAN]

Can u please specify? I'm not doubting that Pac can't win.I just would like to know how,In your opinion.

Hamed was a one-dimensional fighter with virtually no defense. Pacquiao punches just as hard as him, and has many weapons. Manny would be focused, Hamed would probably not be. Barrera exposed every weakness that Princess had, and after that he wasn't the same. Pacquiao is a very good strategist. If you disagree, watch the rematch with Morales. He figured him out, and dominated the last half of the fight. I just don't see this being competitive.

[Sttuddahboy619]

Hamed was a one-dimensional fighter with virtually no defense. Pacquiao punches just as hard as him, and has many weapons. Manny would be focused, Hamed would probably not be. Barrera exposed every weakness that Princess had, and after that he wasn't the same. Pacquiao is a very good strategist. If you disagree, watch the rematch with Morales. He figured him out, and dominated the last half of the fight. I just don't see this being competitive.

I agree with you...It's just that there's alot of people here that make bold statements without the back-up!!!Thanks for replying.

[Roberto_Roldan_]

I think PAc would win no problem he is just TOO strong and fast for him

[187tek9]

Manny has more losses (3)has been knocked out twice,hamed never been knocked out,has better chin, better ko record,conclusion HAMED WINS BY K.O

[MEXICAN_PRIDE]

Manny has more losses (3)has been knocked out twice,hamed never been knocked out,has better chin, better ko record,conclusion HAMED WINS BY K.O

Umm obviously looking at a stat sheet does not tell anyone the whole TRUTH

Hamed has never lost 'cause he fought bums and has-beens 99.9% of the time he was a pro-boxer, all the fighters he fought were guys he was suppose to beat, obviously MAB had other things in mind.

Hamed's chin has never actually been tested and that's a credit to NAZ because he is one slippery dude.

Hamed better k.o. record against who ?!

PAC on the other hand put 3 All-time greats flat on their @sses, hell he knocked out a terrific fighter in Sasakul who had never been down in his life!!

I'd rather knock 3 great fighters out than 100 bums!!!

Going over PAC's losses...

Since I've seen all 3 I can tell you that his loss against the Thai was more like PAC taking a dive 'cause he lost his belt on the scales and it was a complete acting job on PAC's part and just didn't wanna go through a whole 10-12rd. fight when there was nothing to gain.

[beanstalk]

i vote for pac just for the reason of his attitude and determination. pac became a lot better and more determined after his KO losses early in his career.. he even improved a lot after his loss to EM. Now after Hamed's loss, what did he do? Pac would impose his will on Hamed, IMHO.

[187tek9]

Hamed's chin has never actually been tested and that's a credit to NAZ because he is one slippery dude.


Exactly he was so elusive,manny is easier to hit, with NAZ at his peak DEF K.O

[Manny_P]

Nas looked good against weak competition. Pacquiao is a whole new species. Not even on the same league.

[187tek9]

Manny First 2 Losses Were Against Weak Opposition...

[Manny_P]

Manny First 2 Losses Were Against Weak Opposition...

this is boxing. Shyt happens, but Manny has improved greatly since that time. Went on to knock out both the great Barrera and Morales and was OBVIOUSLY robbed against anotha great fighta in Marquez.

Nas was good, but Pacquiao is just amazing.