Manny vs Bradley ll 24/7 discussion thread

[-Makunouchi-]

You got it friend,I moved all my bet's from my sig to my bet book..If you go to my profile you'll see my bet book..I did not have enough space to continue to put my bets down..Your on tho 200bill,and good luck friend..May the best man win..

Good luck my friend a 50/50 fight indeed

[WR Boxing]

All the episode did was look back at each fighter's path since their first fight in 2012. Hopefully the second episode will focus more on their training.

[ADP02]

I found even funny how sure Tim told Max,yes 8-4..I don't know people don't believe in me..Look Max right in his eye..

I also found it funny that they had Max and Jim talking so much on the 24/7..Very unusual..I guess they know everyone seen their nuthuging,and they wanna get out in front..Both(Max a lil less then Jim)are clowns,and came off as such..

They should have a loud Daune Ford to talk if this was the case..

Max: Even of late, Max still feels that there was no way that Bradley won and especially not 8-4. What did he say? Out of 50 ring side analysts who scored it, all but 2 had it for Bradley .... those 2 were the judges. Same with those 5 judges who scored it after the fight. All had it for Manny.

Jim Lampley: He has watched Manny in a lot of fights and you don't get to see someone like Manny fight every day. Jim has enjoyed watching and doing commentary during all those years. If you notice Jim when he talks about Manny in the 24/7, he gets all choked up. It's a truthful emotion and one needs to respect that IMO as it's not fake.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Max: Even of late, Max still feels that there was no way that Bradley won and especially not 8-4. What did he say? Out of 50 ring side analysts who scored it, all but 2 had it for Bradley .... those 2 were the judges. Same with those 5 judges who scored it after the fight. All had it for Manny.

Jim Lampley: He has watched Manny in a lot of fights and you don't get to see someone like Manny fight every day. Jim has enjoyed watching and doing commentary during all those years. If you notice Jim when he talks about Manny in the 24/7, he gets all choked up. It's a truthful emotion and one needs to respect that IMO as it's not fake.

Like I said,should have let Ford get a say..

FordBradley gave Pac a boxing lesson..LMAO..

[ADP02]

Like I said,should have let Ford get a say..

FordBradley gave Pac a boxing lesson..LMAO..

I get it .... you wanted someone who agreed with the decision. No problem that would have been fair to balance it out ......

.... but like Max said, Ford is only one of two who agreed with the score and his commentary was bias, since he was the judge who scored it against Manny. After reviewing the fight, do you think that he was going to say that he was wrong? Not a chance.

Same with Bradley, 8-4 for Bradley? Not even if you give Bradley all the close rounds can Bradley come up with that score!

[Rome-By-Ko]

I get it .... you wanted someone who agreed with the decision. No problem that would have been fair to balance it out ......

.... but like Max said, Ford is only one of two who agreed with the score and his commentary was bias, since he was the judge who scored it against Manny. After reviewing the fight, do you think that he was going to say that he was wrong? Not a chance.

Same with Bradley, 8-4 for Bradley? Not even if you give Bradley all the close rounds can Bradley come up with that score!

This is not true,but hey it is what it is..I'm getting what I want which is for two of my favs to settle it in the ring..I'm good with that..

[ADP02]

This is not true,but hey it is what it is..I'm getting what I want which is for two of my favs to settle it in the ring..I'm good with that..

Which part is not true? 8-4 was possible? No way!

[DeadLikeMe]

For as boring and cringe worthy as most Pacquiao 24/7s are, this one is actually pretty entertaining.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Which part is not true? 8-4 was possible? No way!

3 5 7 8 9 imo were all close rds..I scored the fight 7-5 Bradley,giving Bradley rds 3 and 9..All I'd have to do is give Bradley rd 7 or 8 or 5 and it'd be 8-4..It;s not impossible bro..Not at all..

[mathed]

I rewatched the fight yesterday morning. The commentary sickens me every time I see it...total disregard for all of Bradley's activity and the 20 uppercuts he landed on Pac while in the clinch. They kept talking about all the power punches that Pac was "peppering" Bradley with but made the comment "there is real blood coming from Pac's mouth in the corner" as if Tim hadn't landed any punches to warrant such a thing.

Then, When you can clearly see the two times that Bradley twists his ankles in the 2nd and 4th rounds, and he is in the corner telling Diaz that he felt something pop in his ankle and Diaz is telling him to ignore the pain, Lampley acts like nothing happened and says something along the lines of "Bradley is suggesting that something may have happened to his foot, maybe he twisted his ankle or something". He later comments that there is no way a guy with a hurt foot could move around like that, trying his best to discredit the validity of the injuries.

Pac was also missing many of his shots and took the first two minutes off of literally every round. The fight wasn't a blowout and I could see where someone could eventually get to the point of taking credit away from Pac because of his inactivity, especially if he was supposed to just go out there and destroy this guy who is injured.

I think Bradley will have something in store for Pac this time around.