biggest hw title mess!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • butterfly1964
    The HW Sugar Ray!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2005
    • 10615
    • 374
    • 233
    • 23,822

    #1

    biggest hw title mess!

    in which time period was the hw title mess the worst?
    19
    1968-1970
    5.26%
    1
    1984-1988
    5.26%
    1
    2000-today
    89.47%
    17
  • -Jay-
    Scouse Mouse
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2005
    • 1889
    • 595
    • 1,779
    • 9,027

    #2
    IMO, right now is a little naff.

    Comment

    • butterfly1964
      The HW Sugar Ray!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2005
      • 10615
      • 374
      • 233
      • 23,822

      #3
      actually, i meant to say in the poll 1968-1971. i made a mistake. oh, well.

      Comment

      • jabsRstiff
        ! ! ! !
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2004
        • 8964
        • 498
        • 136
        • 16,167

        #4
        You're in it.

        Comment

        • butterfly1964
          The HW Sugar Ray!
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2005
          • 10615
          • 374
          • 233
          • 23,822

          #5
          well, there is muhammad ali, joe frazier, and jimmy ellis holding part of the belt in 1968-1971. also there are people like mike tyson, michael spinks, trevor berbick, james "bonecrusher" smith, and tony tucker holding belts in 1984-1988, and finally people like nicolay valuev, james toney, vladimir klitchko, and lamon brewster having belts from 2000-today.

          make your vote count, people. which time period was worse?

          Comment

          • DIEGO DA HITMAN
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jan 2006
            • 648
            • 41
            • 40
            • 6,903

            #6
            This is the worst crop of Heavyweights I can remember, so it makes me noxious when I hear people that want to add a Super Heavyweight division.

            Comment

            • Derranged
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2005
              • 46593
              • 2,126
              • 1,351
              • 162,628

              #7
              84-88 wasnt good either. Its pretty close to this era

              Comment

              • Sttuddahboy619
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2006
                • 1784
                • 35
                • 2
                • 8,384

                #8
                We are witnessing it right now!!!

                Comment

                • JMCbulls
                  JMC
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 1205
                  • 90
                  • 190
                  • 7,730

                  #9
                  right now, theyve all been messes, but theyve had better quality fighters (except in mtj's case, but at least then they had one good hw) id rather watch all time greats struggle with eachother than guys who should not hold a belt in a reasonable period of time for HW's

                  Comment

                  • Verstyle
                    Future Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 33130
                    • 2,466
                    • 3,248
                    • 49,262

                    #10
                    who ever voted 84-88 is dumb cause that when tyson ruled the belts pretty much besides 84

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP