I'm changing my stance on Bradley v Pac 1

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pnksntdead
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Oct 2004
    • 677
    • 38
    • 3
    • 14,830

    #61
    Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
    I really thought he was the busy fighter,maybe your looking for eye catching wow kinda shots..Cause Bradley was landing his jab to the head and body over and over again..Not to mention hitting Pac with the hook(now this was not as clean,yet it still landed)when Pac would get out of position..IMO the first 2 rds were clear Bradley rds..I can't be mad if you seen it another way tho,hell imo this whole fight was like this..I hope for a clearer winner this time around..
    eye catching wow kinda shot made Bradley look like a bobble head. Bradley land 2 or 3 good punches in the fight and the rest were a few pittypat jabs, seriously. Never staggered him or had him backing up while PAC had Bradley hurt his feet trying to get away.

    How good are 2-3 jabs around when your opponent keeps knocking your head back like a speed bag each round? You guys think the body shots bothered manny? Manny handled cottos power punches to the body, Bradley body punches must feel like massage for him.

    Round one was Bradley's until he got hit with three straight lefts in the last 20 secs which were better than anything that was landed in the round. Bradley won one clear round, the 10 if recall. He has an argument for 11 and 12.

    Bradley knew he lost after the fight. Asked if thought he won right after the decision, he said that he,ll have to rewatcl lol! Now he says he won 8-4 ))))
    Ask him in couple years, he'll say that he got a tko ))
    Last edited by pnksntdead; 03-23-2014, 11:47 AM.

    Comment

    • SeekDaGreat
      Da' Hood Legend
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2013
      • 9393
      • 341
      • 1,105
      • 19,147

      #62
      Originally posted by BUNGALOWS
      Uuuuuummmmmm..........allllllrighty then............



      Dude, I already knew this. You don't have to butter me up for whatever you're trying to do.
      You're so clever. Little hoe! Haha.

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #63
        Originally posted by Wild Apache
        Bradley clearly won rounds 1-2-10-11-12. Pacman did enough in the other rounds to be considered the winner of those. If you find 2 other rounds where you give Bradley credit for working more than Pacman did, then you could easily have him as the winner. The bottom line is Pacman did not dominate the fight. I do think Pacman won, but it wasn't no bonified lopsided beatdown like so many blind enthusiast like to claim.
        I agree here but Bradley took round 7 too in my opinion.

        Comment

        • ColdBlooded
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Dec 2013
          • 920
          • 126
          • 102
          • 7,531

          #64
          The problem with Bradley's activity was it was ineffective. The vast majority was blocked by Pacquiao. Even in rounds 11 and 12, Bradley threw more but barely landed. If I recall correctly, I thought Pacquiao won 11 based on a few hard clean shots he landed that were better than anything Bradley did, while Bradley won round 12. People like to say Bradley outworked Pacquiao, but it isn't outworking the opponent if your shots are being blocked and missing.

          Comment

          • pnksntdead
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Oct 2004
            • 677
            • 38
            • 3
            • 14,830

            #65
            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
            I thought rds 1 and 2 were really clear..Pac landed 3 to 4 punches in both rds..While Bradley controlled the pace and landed a lot of clean shots to the head and body..No matter how many times I watch this fight..I never give the first 2 rds to Manny..Not active enough,and his punches were not effective at all..
            "Punches were not effective at all" - this how you can describe Bradley for the entire fight

            Comment

            • Rome-By-Ko
              The winner Is
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 20157
              • 323
              • 332
              • 29,833

              #66
              Originally posted by Boxing Goat
              I must have hit a legitimate nerve huh? That's what I thought.

              Everyone, feel free to check out his post history to prove my point.
              Not at all,your just spouting dumb stuff...What they'll find in my post history is a fight fan who respects Pac as much as I respect Bradley..You clearly are like 10 tho,so maybe your comprehension is not up to par yet..

              Comment

              • Rome-By-Ko
                The winner Is
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 20157
                • 323
                • 332
                • 29,833

                #67
                Originally posted by pnksntdead
                eye catching wow kinda shot made Bradley look like a bobble head. Bradley land 2 or 3 good punches in the fight and the rest were a few pittypat jabs, seriously. Never staggered him or had him backing up while PAC had Bradley hurt his feet trying to get away.

                How good are 2-3 jabs around when your opponent keeps knocking your head back like a speed bag each round? You guys think the body shots bothered manny? Manny handled cottos power punches to the body, Bradley body punches must feel like massage for him.

                Round one was Bradley's until he got hit with three straight lefts in the last 20 secs which were better than anything that was landed in the round. Bradley won one clear round, the 10 if recall. He has an argument for 11 and 12.

                Bradley knew he lost after the fight. Asked if thought he won right after the decision, he said that he,ll have to rewatcl lol! Now he says he won 8-4 ))))
                Ask him in couple years, he'll say that he got a tko ))
                Originally posted by pnksntdead
                "Punches were not effective at all" - this how you can describe Bradley for the entire fight
                Effective enough to win the fight tho..Thanks..

                Comment

                • daggum
                  All time great
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 43345
                  • 4,516
                  • 3
                  • 166,270

                  #68
                  Originally posted by ColdBlooded
                  The problem with Bradley's activity was it was ineffective. The vast majority was blocked by Pacquiao. Even in rounds 11 and 12, Bradley threw more but barely landed. If I recall correctly, I thought Pacquiao won 11 based on a few hard clean shots he landed that were better than anything Bradley did, while Bradley won round 12. People like to say Bradley outworked Pacquiao, but it isn't outworking the opponent if your shots are being blocked and missing.
                  sure it is just ask joe calzaghe

                  Comment

                  • Shambrolic
                    Banned
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Feb 2014
                    • 816
                    • 64
                    • 76
                    • 987

                    #69
                    Watching the fight live I was convinced Pacquiao won easily and HBO broadcast was very great in convincing me as well.

                    Second watch with a clear mind... Well I see a lot of what I was missing and I see it that I have to give Bradley 8 rounds. He did everything you could ask for someone without much punching power. He adapted and put more versatility using defense etc. Pacquiao really didn't land as much as I initially thought. I know a lot of people are going to be upset and thumb down my post but I'm not a fan of group think and have to be honest.

                    Like TS I can't sit comfortably and watch this fight over and say Pacquiao won. I am praying he gets the power to knock out Tim because that face off video.. Man.

                    Comment

                    • HeroBando
                      I love Mayweather
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Oct 2011
                      • 17452
                      • 236
                      • 0
                      • 24,430

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Shambrolic
                      Watching the fight live I was convinced Pacquiao won easily and HBO broadcast was very great in convincing me as well.

                      Second watch with a clear mind... Well I see a lot of what I was missing and I see it that I have to give Bradley 8 rounds. He did everything you could ask for someone without much punching power. He adapted and put more versatility using defense etc. Pacquiao really didn't land as much as I initially thought. I know a lot of people are going to be upset and thumb down my post but I'm not a fan of group think and have to be honest.

                      Like TS I can't sit comfortably and watch this fight over and say Pacquiao won. I am praying he gets the power to knock out Tim because that face off video.. Man.
                      Thumbs down from me. 8-4 Bradley? Gtfo.

                      Here's a bunch of people who scored it a rout for Pac without listening to HBO. All named, many familiar names, not some message board alts

                      http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Ma...imothy_Bradley

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP