Comments Thread For: 'Face Off' Reveals Bolder, Brasher Bradley Ahead of Rematch

[MisterHardtop]

That's only a 1 rd difference from what he won by..Change a rd or two(which could happen,a lot of close rds in this fight)here or there and you come up with that..Hell Kenny was very vocal he felt that Bradley could have won by 8-4..

I don't think you need me to tell you how bad the judging in this fight was. So to use that as evidence to support Bradley's conclusions is simply ******.

And by Kenny, do you mean Brian Kenny? He was one of the worst "journalists" involved in boxing and I speak from personal experiences with the man. he's only claim to fame is his interviews with Floyd Mayweather, which, though useful, were meant to be inflammatory.

[Boxing Goat]

What??The result was Bradley with his hands raised..Compubox(aka stats)were an absolute joke and got clown on a national stage on HBO's The Fight Game..Check it out..It should be on HBO Go..

All you need to do is see that 48 out of 50 boxing media experts, Lederman, Kellerman and Lampley scored the fight for Pacquiao. Beyond that, there's no discussion. Oh, and Ray Charles could see that Manny landed way more shots than Bradley did, even if the stats werent perfect.

Next.........

[zapdos]

this is the fight why Bradley signed with top rank.

very winnable fight again.

Bradley beats him again, pac will get lost in the desert storm once again

[Boxing Goat]

this is the fight why Bradley signed with top rank.

very winnable fight again.

Bradley beats him again, pac will get lost in the desert storm once again

Keep dreaming, he didn't even really win the first fight.

[Rome-By-Ko]

I don't think you need me to tell you how bad the judging in this fight was. So to use that as evidence to support Bradley's conclusions is simply ******.

And by Kenny, do you mean Brian Kenny? He was one of the worst "journalists" involved in boxing and I speak from personal experiences with the man. he's only claim to fame is his interviews with Floyd Mayweather, which, though useful, were meant to be inflammatory.

Well I respectfully disagree with ya post..Agree to disagree..

Just pointing out that 7-5 is not far off from 8-4..Esp when rds were(and in this fight imo there were a lot of um)so close..

[Rome-By-Ko]

All you need to do is see that 48 out of 50 boxing media experts, Lederman, Kellerman and Lampley scored the fight for Pacquiao. Beyond that, there's no discussion. Oh, and Ray Charles could see that Manny landed way more shots than Bradley did, even if the stats werent perfect.

Next.........

Well that settles that,Jim Max and Harold..Oh snap ya'll..

GIFSoup

BTW Bradley landed the best shot of the fight..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I don't think you need me to tell you how bad the judging in this fight was. So to use that as evidence to support Bradley's conclusions is simply ******.

Trust me, he'll keep using it

[Rome-By-Ko]

Trust me, he'll keep using it

Dirk,how my d1ck taste..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Dirk,how my d1ck taste..

Like Tim Bradley's ass I would assume

[Nightfall]

Bradley second victory will be even clearer. Pacquiao just and only can fight the same way.