How come when Top Rank puts on in house fights, its a bad thing, but when

[Vasyl’s dad]

GBP does it, "they're putting on the best fights possible"?

[_original_]

[Bushbaby]

Well that's not entirely true. But the fact is golden boy has a bigger roster so they're able to put on more matches without recycling opponents.

[ShoulderRoll]

Because when GBP does it you get meaningful fights like Matthysse vs Garcia and Mares vs Chemito.

[The Tase]

Because when GBP does it you get meaningful fights like Matthysse vs Garcia and Mares vs Chemito.

yeaaa!!!!!

matthysse vs garcia and mares vs chemito are certainly more meaningful than cotto margarito, cotto pacquiao, morales pacquiao, marquez pacquiao.

I mean who needs to fight top 10 p4p fighters in the entire sport like marquez and bradley when you can build up your legacy fighting robert guerrero, victor ortiz, and amir khan's leftovers.




What world do you people live in?

[Porter's Dad]

GBP does it, "they're putting on the best fights possible"?

I remember when a certain garbage fanbase would simply not STFU about "in-house fights" killing the sport.

Interestingly, they also went through a period of intense hatred over catchweights.

Both these issues suddenly went away and become non-issues as quickly as they had become an issue.

Flowmos seriously are the biggest bunch of idiots you are likely to encounter.

[Hougigo]

Most the times when they do it, it's against good fighters.... they still put mismatches on too though.

That's because they have a hold of a majority of the quality in the weight class.

[Porter's Dad]

Seriously, whatever happened to catchweights destroying the sport boxing?

There you go, OP. There's your next thread idea.

[The Tase]

Seriously, whatever happened to catchweights destroying the sport boxing?

There you go, OP. There's your next thread idea.

there's so many double standards to choose from.

[HanzGruber]

Cause tr has 4 welterweights