The Better Resume! Money Or Pacman?

[Jack Napier]

I know this kind of thread has been done repeatedly in the past.. i just wanted to have some opinions as of right NOW thats all...



i understand the fact that pac has always challenged himself and had some great fights against big names and dominated them, but then again, hasn't floyd also done the same and kept his ''0'' whilst doin it?

Pac's beaten greater fighters than Floyd has, it's that simple
nobody cares about that "unbeaten" crap outside of NSB
some of the best fighters ever have losses, it don't diminish them
that "Floyd's great due to his '0' and box office" shit is laughable

[Rocky_Balboa89]

Jack Napier beat me to it lol..

thanks for the reply man!

[The Big Dunn]

Manny gets credit for his names under 130. Once we get north of that its floyd. A lot of the names on manny's resume are glossy but when he beat them matters.

Take erik morales-when manny lost to him erik was 48-2 and had only lost to barrera. when manny beat him-he had lost the previous fight to zahir raheem and then went on to be 2-7. 2 losses to manny and years later 2 losses to danny garcia.

[Jsmooth9876]

Manny gets credit for his names under 130. Once we get north of that its floyd. A lot of the names on manny's resume are glossy but when he beat them matters.

Take erik morales-when manny lost to him erik was 48-2 and had only lost to barrera. when manny beat him-he had lost the previous fight to zahir raheem and then went on to be 2-7. 2 losses to manny and years later 2 losses to danny garcia.

I think it's the same with Floyd honestly. All his good wins came early like Corrales,Castillo,Hernandez etc...
Later on he minus Canelo who could end up being a great star he fought a bunch of guys past their best(Mosely,Oscar,Cotto)
Both resumes are comparable though.

[Da Machine]

In all liklihood Mayweather is going to be a higher rated ATG when both guys have long since retired. Especially if Mayweather decides to go 50-0 and keeps beating top 3-5 guys at 147 or 154.

[daggum]

I know this kind of thread has been done repeatedly in the past.. i just wanted to have some opinions as of right NOW thats all...



i understand the fact that pac has always challenged himself and had some great fights against big names and dominated them, but then again, hasn't floyd also done the same and kept his ''0'' whilst doin it?

no, no he has not

[Strategic1]

Manny gets credit for his names under 130. Once we get north of that its floyd. A lot of the names on manny's resume are glossy but when he beat them matters.

Take erik morales-when manny lost to him erik was 48-2 and had only lost to barrera. when manny beat him-he had lost the previous fight to zahir raheem and then went on to be 2-7. 2 losses to manny and years later 2 losses to danny garcia.

You have to keep in mind in PAC-Morales 1...PAC got a cut around the eye from accidental heads clashing. He essentially couldn't see fully the rest of the fight.

As for his 2-7 record... Perhaps, it could be said Morales was never the same after Morales-Pac 1. That fight was a war.

[BUNGALOWS]

done to death, Pac's resume blows Floyd's outta the fucking water

Jack always brings that ether.

[MBE]

Mayweather above 147, pacman below.

But I'd give an edge to mayweather because he was never stretched.

[Larry the boss]

5 years ago i would side with Manny..but since then Floyd has came on strong and imo has a better resume now