nothing more needs to be said when your talking about a BEAST
Tim Bradley p4p #1
Collapse
-
-
-
-
no way he beat pac the first fight but it is what it is n to let you ***gs know im rooting for both but theres no denying bradley he is a ***in king pin in the game this is a battle of GREATS p4pComment
-
Well he definatley deserves brownie points for taking pac on twice when the supposedly no1 didn't dare tread those grounds, even if Bradley did lose to Pac the first fight with Pac.
But Floyd has looked more impressive than Bradley in the fights Floyd had, so it evens itself out a bit. Bradley fought the better fighter, but Floyd looked better beating who he beat.Comment
-
why even mention fraud in this thread bradleys resume ****s on him anyone would look good fighting bums pac prooved that when he shutout rios 12-0 something fraud has never done and he is supposed to be the defensive kingWell he definatley deserves brownie points for taking pac on twice when the supposedly no1 didn't dare tread those grounds, even if Bradley did lose to Pac the first fight with Pac.
But Floyd has looked more impressive than Bradley in the fights Floyd had, so it evens itself out a bit. Bradley fought the better fighter, but Floyd looked better beating who he beat.Comment
-
I'll give you that he is arguably top 5-10. But that 33 professional fights and only 10 knockouts, that doesn't exactly scream "BEAST." So I can only take this comment half-heartedly. He's been squeaking by - by the skin of his teeth lately. And was on the winning side of arguably the biggest robbery in the last 5 years.
So if that screams beast to you....then we have different definitions of a beast.Comment
-
He is not a better boxer than Mayweather. He is not a better fighter than Pacquiao as proven in their first fight. Neither is he as impressive as any of those two.
#3 or anything under that would be realistic and acceptable.Comment
Comment