If you had Broner winning vs Paulie...

[Jc8804]

Paulie and herrera were robbed .

This thread from the op is so true.
Paulie boxed circles and outworked broner
And herrera beat up danny

[Deeznuts]

So now a bloody nose justifies who wins a fight? What are we in middle school? It was a close fight. You guys crying over a robbery. In some rounds Herrera landed jabs to the body here and there but Danny was landing some power shots. Paulie outworked Broner as Herrera did here but the fighter that landed the power shots won. I scored the fight round by round it was close but I scored it for Danny. Garcia is limited but there was no robbery.

[Deeznuts]

At least be consistent. If you appreciate more punches landed vs power punches landed, then you had Herrera and Paulie as the winner

[bojangles1987]

Very ****** logic. Broner landed enough clean shots in enough rounds to clearly win a fight he struggled in. Garcia didn't.

They weren't the exact same fight, and pretending they are is ******.

[FerFAL]

You had Garcia winning on the cards. Same type of fight, Paulie landed more jabs and body shots, Broner landed fewer harder shots

No, no, no, no, no, no. NO!
For fks sakes, what's wrong with people here?

[Tru]

You had Garcia winning on the cards. Same type of fight, Paulie landed more jabs and body shots, Broner landed fewer harder shots

So let me get this straight. Garcia beat Herrera because Broner beat Paulie? When your best justification for someone winning a fight is bringing up a completely different fight, you know you've gone full ******.