Didn't realize Tim Bradley's resume was this deep.

[bojangles1987]

no way marquez is his best win, marquez is 40 years old for ****s sake, regardless of what type of win he was coming off of.

best win is alexander. prime for prime

then peterson, vazquez, holt

tho man there are lot of asterisks man, pacquiao, provo, and a lot of old dudes.

Marquez at 40 is waaaaaay better than Devon Alexander. Devon Alexander's loss to Bradley was just one of three in a row.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

That's just a list of names that look decent on paper.

Delve a little deeper and it isn't all that good a resume.

[soul_survivor]

Pacquiao (Very controversial)
Marquez (coming of KO 6 of Pac)
Provodnikov
Abregu (1st loss)
Peterson (1st loss)
Alexander (1st loss)
Witter (in the UK)
Miguel Vasquez
Kendall holt
Nate Campbell and joel casamayor for good measure

Yeah, that's a good resume, I'd take Pac off the list completely though and Abregu, he is C+ at best.

Casamayor was old as hell and Campbell was ok.

His run of Witter, Peterson and Alexander was impressive though.

Bradley gets let down due and ridiculed due to his behaviour post-Pac 1 and the fact that he openly ducked Khan. Other than that, I like him.

[Bushbaby]

That's just a list of names that look decent on paper.

Delve a little deeper and it isn't all that good a resume.

It's better than Khan's though.

[BennyST]

Pacquiao (Very controversial)
Marquez (coming of KO 6 of Pac)
Provodnikov
Abregu (1st loss)
Peterson (1st loss)
Alexander (1st loss)
Witter (in the UK)
Miguel Vasquez
Kendall holt
Nate Campbell and joel casamayor for good measure

Great resume so far, but you just can't add Pac to his wins. It's worse than saying Whitaker didn't beat Chavez. In every single respect of boxing scoring, Pac dominated the fight.

That was one of the few times you can call a genuinely disgraceful corrupt robbery.

[VatoMulatto]

no way marquez is his best win, marquez is 40 years old for ****s sake, regardless of what type of win he was coming off of.

best win is alexander. prime for prime

then peterson, vazquez, holt

tho man there are lot of asterisks man, pacquiao, provo, and a lot of old dudes.

Mrquez is definitely his best win. Don't bring up his age. Marquez was not an old slow over the hill fighter. He had just KO'd Pac cold.

The only name you can take off this list is Pac cause that decision was bull**** but He did beat Provo. A very close fight but still did enough to win.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

It's better than Khan's though.

What does Khan have to do with this? Khan is younger than Bradley and has less experience. I wouldn't expect him to have a better resume but if that's your yardstick then ok...lol

How does Khan's **** taste? It's always in your mouth so was just wondering

[New England]

Yeah, that's a good resume, I'd take Pac off the list completely though and Abregu, he is C+ at best.

Casamayor was old as hell and Campbell was ok.

His run of Witter, Peterson and Alexander was impressive though.

Bradley gets let down due and ridiculed due to his behaviour post-Pac 1 and the fact that he openly ducked Khan. Other than that, I like him.

is it really a duck of khan when you're trying to get [and are successful] a fight with manny pacquiao?

[New England]

What does Khan have to do with this? Khan is younger than Bradley and has less experience. I wouldn't expect him to have a better resume but if that's your yardstick then ok...lol

How does Khan's **** taste? It's always in your mouth so was just wondering

khan's got plenty of experience and is old enough. he's in his physical prime.


the difference between bradley and khan is that khan has seriously deteriorated, and hardly getting by mexican journeymen.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

khan's got plenty of experience and is old enough. he's in his physical prime.


the difference between bradley and khan is that khan has seriously deteriorated, and hardly getting by mexican journeymen.

The difference between Bradley and Khan was never established because Bradley was too worried about what might have happened had he lost.