Did Malik Scott take a dive against Wilder?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fooliun_Smaxon
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 168
    • 16
    • 0
    • 262

    #181
    Originally posted by WilkinsOlajuwon
    Well its not even close to being all fixed. Sometimes we dont get the decisions we want but most of the time its because fights are subjective and judges view things differently and there are a lot of ****ty judges.
    Canelo/Angulo, Wilder/Scott and Garcia/Herrera were all definitely fixed. The first two probably by bribery/blackmail and the second by judge bribing. It's the only explanation for the strangeness of those fights.

    Comment

    • WilkinsOlajuwon
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2013
      • 2506
      • 73
      • 54
      • 8,736

      #182
      Originally posted by Fooliun_Smaxon
      Canelo/Angulo, Wilder/Scott and Garcia/Herrera were all definitely fixed. The first two probably by bribery/blackmail and the second by judge bribing. It's the only explanation for the strangeness of those fights.
      This isnt the X-files. Angulo was getting his azz kicked and even if you dont agree there is nothing "strange" about early stoppages. Those have been around for awhile and will continue to be. Refereeing is difficult work.

      Garcia v Herrera was a closer fight than predicted but in no way was a robbery. That just ridiculous. That besmirches the real robberies that have taken place. Again, close decisions are not "strange"

      Scott perhaps just didnt want to take punishment from his friend. To me the matchmaking for that fight is the problem not the result.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP