Erislandy Lara "Finally A World Champion"
Collapse
-
-
I think your right.
So interesting scenario. Pacquiao / Bradley winner is Floyd's mandatory at 147, which the WBC says they will enforce. If Lara is Floyd's mandatory at 154, and they enforce it, does he lose both belts?Comment
-
-
Pac-Bradley 2 can't be a WBC eliminator
Bradley holds the WBO WW belt, so WBC won't rank the winner
and WBA only gave Lara the "regular" title, Floyd has the super title
so Floyd gets like 18 months or something before he must face Lara
and Floyd would never fight Lara no matter what ruling was madeComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
The whole thing is nonsense.
Canelo was the 'regular' champion through defeating Austin Trout. But then he LOST the 'regular' title when he lost to Floyd Mayweather.
Technically, if they aren't going to allow for Floyd to hold BOTH the regular and super titles, then Canelo should still be champion. Instead they give the title to Lara, which is ridiculous.
Comment
-
Oh right for some reason i was thinking WBC belt. I remember something recently that the WBC was going to make Pacquiao mandatory but I guess that goes out the window if he wins the WBOPac-Bradley 2 can't be a WBC eliminator
Bradley holds the WBO WW belt, so WBC won't rank the winner
and WBA only gave Lara the "regular" title, Floyd has the super title
so Floyd gets like 18 months or something before he must face Lara
and Floyd would never fight Lara no matter what ruling was madeComment
Comment