The Official Carl Froch vs George Groves II Thread
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
I agree, but he should cover up better and be more patient in the first 3 rounds though. He's probably too stubborn which is one of the reasons I love the man.
At least that's what I think, I'm not sure by any means. It's very intriguing this matchup. Really is!Last edited by Scary; 03-11-2014, 07:42 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't know who will win (leaning towards Groves), but it'll be a fantastic fight.
Both fighters will be better than the last time. Groves is a better technical fighter and he should win if he can keep it together, but he'll most certainly get in exchanges where froch will have an edge.
This pre fight mental games normally don't mean a lot, but in this case I really think they are important. Last time Groves managed to somehow get to Froch and it did affected him.
Groves is incredibly mentally strong has great belief in him self and nothing seems to phase him.
Froch on the other hand is looking mentally weak againComment
-
-
Comment
-
"Neutral" officials? They're both English and the referee was English. The terminology doesn't even make sense.
Foster is a **** referee, neutrality has nothing to do with it.Comment
-
Groves wants to bring in some top class international judges and ref.
I wonder why Froch is against it?
No UK stoppages?
No getting away with constant fouls?
Scoring the fight properly?
All things Froch can't be happy about.
No wonder he is against it.Comment
-
I don't think he said he was against it. He isn't happy that Groves is questioning the integrity of the BBBofC and their officials.
Groves should be thankful to them considering the "UK stoppage" he got against Kenny Anderson and the gift decision he got against James DeGale.
In fact, he should thank Howard Foster because he kept George Groves from being knocked clean out and kept him relevant in the sport of boxing to the point where he's secured this money spinning rematch.
You're welcome George.Comment
Comment