I watched a few of Lomachenko's amateur fights...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Salardo
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2011
    • 1364
    • 135
    • 1
    • 7,933

    #1

    I watched a few of Lomachenko's amateur fights...

    First of all, I like Lomachenko, I think he was a great amateur and I think he can be world champ in the pros.
    I do not watch a lot of amateur boxing in general, anyways - now I went back and watched parts of a few different amateur fights of Lomachenko and I gotta say that I am surprised he won 396 fights and lost only 1. Here is the reason: he fights in the amateurs by throwing combos and then he gets away with his footwork to not get countered. Nothing looks super spectacular and he doesn't look like a complete ring general and he doesn't look like he is dominating his opponents - at least in the random 4 amateur fights I watched. So I did not watch all his big amateur fights but I just watched a few different fights to get to know the style he used.

    So - when people say he is the greatest amateur boxer of all time then this has to be based on his record. Because I remember guys like Mario Kindelan or Felix Savon looked at least in my opinion a lot more dominant in their amateur fights than Lomachenko.
    So I am a little bit surprised that Lomachenko could pile up such an amazing amateur record. Especially in the amateurs people get robbed left and right and Lomachenko's boxing style does not make him look like the ring general every minute of every fight.
    So - again - I like Lomachenko, I am looking forward to his pro career, I wish him all the best.

    Just wanted to say this.
    Anybody else watched some of Lomachenko's amateur fights?
  • SplitSecond
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23151
    • 1,715
    • 1,187
    • 85,044

    #2
    he's a good amatuer like amir khan, similar styles, except khan had a glass chin

    freddie roach khan would have been unstoppable in the AM's

    Comment

    • Joe Grizzley
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Feb 2013
      • 717
      • 168
      • 43
      • 6,383

      #3
      I'll say this, being a great amateur nowadays doesn't mean jack shi.t.

      Being a great amateur in the 80's or early 90's, different story.

      Comment

      • Foreign Soil
        First Time Skeptic
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2013
        • 5249
        • 194
        • 219
        • 11,783

        #4
        Originally posted by Joe Grizzley
        I'll say this, being a great amateur nowadays doesn't mean jack shi.t.

        Being a great amateur in the 80's or early 90's, different story.
        If you think that way then being a great pro means less than jack sheeit nowadays considering international amateur competition is better than 99% of pro competition.

        Comment

        • richardt
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 22170
          • 2,640
          • 210
          • 77,067

          #5
          Originally posted by Joe Grizzley
          I'll say this, being a great amateur nowadays doesn't mean jack shi.t. Being a great amateur in the 80's or early 90's, different story.
          Ice John Scully has a huge list of top Pro fighters who fought in the AM's and back then there was an endless supply of talented fighters. Early 80's Mark Brelend was unstoppable as an AM. Too many to count.

          Comment

          • DosRounds
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2013
            • 2990
            • 258
            • 557
            • 10,414

            #6
            now that you said that it's kind of a surprise. Maybehe just knows how to get the w

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP