Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez Doesn't Feel Angulo Quit Against Lara
Collapse
-
-
if its a legal advantage then there is nothing wrong with that, is like laras reach advantage... please dont tell me that lara cant look good on a legal size ring, you and i know that lara is better than that, so stop the excuses...
like i said even with all those advantages this fight was supposed to be a mismatch , when angulo was mentioned for canelo instead of trout we all called a mismatch and a cherrypick at the time...Comment
-
It was obvious Angulo didn't want to fight no longer. Thumbless gloves and it was more like the forehead not the eye that was troubling . That is my opinion and Cuba has nothing to do with what I saw .Comment
-
Look man I can't argue with u in circles . You said if it's a official ring size no fighter has an advantage ,I disagreed . Now u call it a " legal advantage" and write a buncha crapif its a legal advantage then there is nothing wrong with that, is like laras reach advantage... please dont tell me that lara cant look good on a legal size ring, you and i know that lara is better than that, so stop the excuses...
like i said even with all those advantages this fight was supposed to be a mismatch , when angulo was mentioned for canelo instead of trout we all called a mismatch and a cherrypick at the time...Comment
-
Since when the f**k do they choose the ring size and mat based on what they want for the UNDERCARD fight? Maidana vs. Lopez was the main event. The fighters in the main event choose all of that s**t. And then you probably want to talk about a rehydration clause for Lara too, huh? And they can't even prove it because it wasn't even in the contract, hahaha.Angulo was conditioned very well and fought a smart fight for him that he lost. I'm not taking that away from him.
U claim that they didn't want Lara to lose ... Why the small ring and Heavy mat ? Those seem to me to be two advantages to Angulo , not for Lara .
Now ask yourself if they were trying to be fair how could they do this ?
It's because they weren't trying to be fair because they want Lara to lose .Comment
-
to me thats not an advantage, but if you call it an advantage then is a legal advantage that should not be used as an excuse like reach, height, etc...
but then even if i give this to you as an advantage , it is not an excuse for such a mismatch at the time...lara was supposed to do easy job of this fight, and no way gb or anybody were thinking lara was supposed to loose or look bad...Comment
-
what I find it funny is that, non of the undercard fighters complained about the ring size or padded mat but Lara, that is extrange in my opinion.Since when the f**k do they choose the ring size and mat based on what they want for the UNDERCARD fight? Maidana vs. Lopez was the main event. The fighters in the main event choose all of that s**t. And then you probably want to talk about a rehydration clause for Lara too, huh? And they can't even prove it because it wasn't even in the contract, hahaha.Comment
-
Comment
-
Oh so u think maidana wanted the small ring and Heavy mat ? Or was it Lopez ? Lmao . It was gbp ....Since when the f**k do they choose the ring size and mat based on what they want for the UNDERCARD fight? Maidana vs. Lopez was the main event. The fighters in the main event choose all of that s**t. And then you probably want to talk about a rehydration clause for Lara too, huh? And they can't even prove it because it wasn't even in the contract, hahaha.
Read my previous posts about rehydration clause aboveComment
-
Comment

lmao
Comment