Who is More Overrated, Canelo or Broner?

[Oasis_Lad]

When you have two differences of opinion and aren't sure if you fall on this side or that, I look and this poll question, analyse it, and come to the conclusion that they're both shit.

[-Antonio-]

Well the Broner hype is pretty much gone now thankfully. We'll see how Canelo handles Angulo. I still think he's overrated considering his biggest test before Mayweather was Trout and to me he lost 5 rounds. And outside of Trout his resume is a joke.

[BigZigga]

When was Litzau a champ? Oh, that's right, NEVER. Broner lost to Ponce De Leon, and arguably lost to Malignaggi. DeMarco is Broner's only decent win.

I don't see how you would count Litzau as legit for Broner, but not include Mosley, Cintron, and Baldomir on Canelo's resume. And Miguel Vazquez twice.

Canelo held the WBC 154 pound belt for 2 years before he beat a legitimate top 10 contender at the weight...and a lot of people thought he lost to Trout....no, Mosley, Baldo and Cintron do not count
Vazquez wasn't at his best weight honestly. He fights at 135...Canelo fights at 154 and is a huge 154
That is not a great resume
I'm sorry
I think people are picking Canelo as less overrated because they hate Broner so much. He just has better resume than Saul does

[Nights King]

Well the Broner hype is pretty much gone now thankfully. We'll see how Canelo handles Angulo. I still think he's overrated considering his biggest test before Mayweather was Trout and to me he lost 5 rounds. And outside of Trout his resume is a joke.

Absolutely agree with you.

[puga]

broner has impressed me in some of his fights , something canelo has yet to do, just my personal view...broner has beaten better fighters aswell

[White_Knight]

How can Canelo be overrated when his first legit loss is to the current #1 P4P, at 23 years of age no less?

That Trout fight was extremely close. Most the fans had it scored for Trout.

Broner is good although he was overrated before the Maidana loss. He has very poor reflexes for such a young man.

[Dinamita 03]

Canelo held the WBC 154 pound belt for 2 years before he beat a legitimate top 10 contender at the weight...and a lot of people thought he lost to Trout....no, Mosley, Baldo and Cintron do not count
Vazquez wasn't at his best weight honestly. He fights at 135...Canelo fights at 154 and is a huge 154
That is not a great resume
I'm sorry
I think people are picking Canelo as less overrated because they hate Broner so much. He just has better resume than Saul does

Just some info on Canelo vs Vazquez,.

Both guys started their careers at welterweight. Vazquez holds a height and reach advantage over Alvarez . Alvarez was around 16 and Vazquez 20 ,if I'm not mistaken ,so basically Canelo was still a skinny boy and nowhere near as thick as he is now. Weight was not an issue, in fact Vazquez had all the advantages. He won a SD and two years later earned a UD, and aside from Bradley is the only guy to beat Vazquez.

I could be wrong but I think Rhodes was top 10 when they fought

[Holywarrior]

It's amazing to me that Canelo is "overrated" when he and Lara have the same top win, but Lara is now seen as this monster (yet struggled vs friggen Vanes and Molina)

[toshmurph]

Canelo held the WBC 154 pound belt for 2 years before he beat a legitimate top 10 contender at the weight...and a lot of people thought he lost to Trout....no, Mosley, Baldo and Cintron do not count
Vazquez wasn't at his best weight honestly. He fights at 135...Canelo fights at 154 and is a huge 154
That is not a great resume
I'm sorry
I think people are picking Canelo as less overrated because they hate Broner so much. He just has better resume than Saul does

You realise that Canelo fought Vasquez when he was 16 and 18 at 140 & 147 respectively! No way was Canelo bigger than Vasquez either times as he hadn't developed physically.. Now I never seen the fights and it wouldn't surprise me if Vasquez was shafted in those fights as I'm sure the Mexican judges would favour Canelos style over Vasquez! Saying that, as is it's a good win in Canelos career!

Canelo fought Ryan Rhodes in his first fight after getting the belt! I agree Canelo shouldn't have got to fight Hatton for the vacant belt but that isn't holding on to the belt "for 2 years" before fighting a legit 154!

FYI Rhodes is a much more legit opponent than Litzau, tell us why you don't think Mosley, Cintron and Baldo don't count?

I am one of those who thought that Trout beat Alvarez, but that's irrelevant now he's got some good names on his resume!

You mentioned Ponce for Broner yet dismissed trout for Alvarez!? Broner lost to ponce more clearly than Alvarez to trout!, Broner also lost to Quintero quite clearly! You also mentioned about Canelos big weight advantage over opponents? What of Broner's weight advantage over guys at 130 (a division where he was given a title also, and fought nobody at the weight) and 135, where he fought one legit guy in De Marco! He'll Broner outweighed Maidana on fight night but you don't mention that!

People say Canelo is not as overrated as Broner because it's true, not because of the hate!

[Flash13]

Canelo has to be the more overrated,,,, both are hype jobs, but canelo is getting put into a ppv main event after getting undressed by floyd

Neither has impressed me much in terms of being the next major superstar,, Fernando Vargas was a much better prospect than canelo

Broner hasnt headlined any ppv yet, let alone headlining one after an embarrassing loss

Canelo has the most hype of any up coming fighter, so it has to be Canelo

This 100%, especially about vargas he was way better than canelo at his age. I think the open scoring hurt trout in the canelo fight. I mean that one card was like 79-72 canelo after nine rounds. I think trout tried to push the fight after that because he realized he wasn't getting a decision, and that was the reason he lost the fight 114-113(my score).