Oh yes that makes complete sense to say that Groves would have most likely won when at the time of the stoppage he was the one who couldn't put one foot in front of the other as he stumbled his way into Fosters arms completely unaware of his surroundings until he was let go which took a good few seconds by the way. The shot that dropped Froch was a gift because Froch basically ran into it. How come Groves couldn't Finish Froch with all those unanswered right hands afterwards? I don't think Groves has the power to drop Froch unless Froch walks into the punch and if Groves exerts all his energy early trying to do so then hes getting put to sleep later in the fight.
Comments Thread For: David Haye Views Froch-Groves II as 50-50 Fight
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Hungry or not Groves isn't grabbing anything if he doesn't have the ability to stand with Froch once Froch finds his range and it also appears that Groves doesn't have the ability to put Froch away based on the amount of solid overhand rights he connected with that didn't put Froch on the canvas. The only one that did put Froch on the canvas is the one Froch walked into.
Groves has a slim chance to win the next fight and its only gonna happen if Froch is careless.
Froch will eat/absorb that right hand all day until Groves slows down like he did in the last fight. I predict a Bute/Taylor finish which is exactly what was about to happen in the last fight.Last edited by l1ght; 02-24-2014, 04:36 AM.Comment
-
Comment