Watch any Jack Johnson fight. Lots and lots of holding
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
back in the day did crowds boo and complain about pure boxers
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by lumiere View Postlike they do these days with miguel vasquez and rigondeaux ? for being too cautious or boring.or were they revered,respected,and applauded for their talent ? i feel like this is a modern day thing.am i wrong ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by RockyIV View PostThey booed Bill Richmond when he fought Tom Cribb in the early 19th century because he actually used footwork.
Imagine that being booed for moving around and not standing in one spot all night.
So fans are a lot more appreciative and patient now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostYes, fans did the exact same thing then. Don't be mistaken, boxing fans have always wanted entertainment above all else.
OP, no-----they didn't boo. People actually liked talent then instead of smoke and mirrors.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lumiere View Postlike they do these days with miguel vasquez and rigondeaux ? for being too cautious or boring.or were they revered,respected,and applauded for their talent ? i feel like this is a modern day thing.am i wrong ?
The bigger point you raise is this issue of what is now known as a pure boxer. Someone who jabs, stays on the backfoot and fails to engage his opponent in meaningful exchanges, thus boring the crowds. As I was growing up, a tonne of great fighters were known as great "boxers" and they all had varying styles. Ali was fleet footed and elusive but could engage in a dogfight, the greatest all round fighter I have ever seen, with Leonard a close second. Duran was always considered a great boxer and technician but nowadays the same accolade is not laid upon Pacquiao who I think is the only fighter since Duran to come close to that same level of aggressive supremacy and defensive nuance.
A "pure boxer" is a term that shouldn't really exist, what is a pure boxer? Why is aggressive, entertaining way of fighting not viewed as boxing compared to a defensive fighter? They are both different sides of the same coin.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by #1Assassin View Postto a certain degree but not like today. back in the day more fans understood the sport and appreciated it for what it is. intelligent and skillful fighters were appreciated for their abilities by most people and the ones who didnt like it were at the very least smart enough not to buy a ticket knowing the style of the fighter.
its hilarious to me when people pay for a fight knowing damn well the guy fighting is a technician, then they complain afterwards like they got robbed of their money. might as well go to the store, buy some milk then storm in the place 15min later furious its not a loaf of bread.
Comment
-
Comment