P4P: 2014 vs 1994....Who wins?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Holywarrior
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2013
    • 3974
    • 134
    • 38
    • 4,274

    #11
    Jeesh. Boxing has fallen so hard since then

    Comment

    • Sugar Adam Ali
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 27630
      • 970
      • 1,174
      • 82,827

      #12
      94 by far.... Sweet pea, prime Roy, depth is much better

      Comment

      • lx!!
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Feb 2011
        • 883
        • 26
        • 0
        • 7,250

        #13
        The 90's IMO was boxing last great era. No disrespect to today's fighter's, but back then the best fought the best, they were willing to fight anyone anytime to prove they were the best & there wasn't as much of the silly beefs/wars ect BS to deal with & fighters couldn't hide behind a network, promoter or anything. Back then the top fightes all had loses & people still wanted to see them more because they put it all on the line. Now if you lose or get a draw everyone is quick to call them bums or exposed... When in reality we should give credit for them testing them selves. Also ducking is ALLOT more accepted & defended today.

        Comment

        • Doriaan
          Up and Comer
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • May 2013
          • 69
          • 6
          • 0
          • 6,167

          #14
          "Now if you lose or get a draw everyone is quick to call them bums or exposed..."
          Agree

          "Also ducking is ALLOT more accepted & defended today."
          HELL NO !!

          Comment

          • lx!!
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Feb 2011
            • 883
            • 26
            • 0
            • 7,250

            #15
            Originally posted by Doriaan
            "Now if you lose or get a draw everyone is quick to call them bums or exposed..."
            Agree

            "Also ducking is ALLOT more accepted & defended today."
            HELL NO !!
            To me it's not & I don't defend it, but you do have fans that do & also some fighters try to justify it & some how still get praised when they do.

            Comment

            • makabu101
              Amateur
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Feb 2014
              • 16
              • 0
              • 0
              • 6,086

              #16
              Originally posted by Stallion_
              None of them is better than Rigondeaux.
              Finally someone who knows something about boxing, james toney and jcc would have never been on the level of rigondeaux, the man is a pure strategist and a master of the sweet science and anybody that doesnt think so is truly ignrant when it comes to boxing!!!

              Comment

              • merker
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Jun 2006
                • 223
                • 21
                • 0
                • 6,567

                #17
                Originally posted by lx!!
                The 90's IMO was boxing last great era. No disrespect to today's fighter's, but back then the best fought the best, they were willing to fight anyone anytime to prove they were the best & there wasn't as much of the silly beefs/wars ect BS to deal with & fighters couldn't hide behind a network, promoter or anything. Back then the top fightes all had loses & people still wanted to see them more because they put it all on the line. Now if you lose or get a draw everyone is quick to call them bums or exposed... When in reality we should give credit for them testing them selves. Also ducking is ALLOT more accepted & defended today.
                Rid**** Bowe was frozen out of the HW title after his loss to holyfield...RJJ ever fought Nigel Benn or rematched JT...Bob Arum and DonKing prevented a lot of good fights, though they finally had to make some happen due to poor PPV sales

                Comment

                • merker
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 223
                  • 21
                  • 0
                  • 6,567

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Stallion_
                  None of them is better than Rigondeaux.
                  Rigo is as good as they come...but a no way his style beats a prime RJJ...too much offense from RJJ...now a prime Sweet Pea and Rigondeaux would be a chess match of the highest order

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP