Do you think Wlad will be remembered as a great?

[BLOODSHED]

Are you stuck on ******?

I said "great boxer" not "boxing great". Read again, Mr. Dyslexia.

Are you ******? Why don't you understand what I'm saying?

I said I don't think he's a "Boxing Great", but he is a great boxer. He has excellent boxing skills.

It doesn't matter who you've fought it be condsidered to have great boxing skills. It matters who you've fought to be considered a boxing great.

Do you understand what I'm saying?

[DiegoFuego]

If Wlad somehow unifies all four titles and successfully defends them for 4 years I will consider him great. Until then, you gotta be ****ing joking.

[blockhead]

Who?

excactly!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[The Fix]

Who?

held a piece of the title for a bit, feared for his life against tyson. lost to gerald "two ****" nobles...

[Leo Pradun]

Not great.. he is just big and slow..

ur a natural peder, he is not slow...

[GunStar]

No even if he dominates for the next 4 years, which I doubt he will, he will be considered good, but not great.

[Leo Pradun]

if wlad beats brewster, winner of rahman toney and will be undisputed for a few years he will be considered great to me...

[marlo]

Wlad is clearly the most skilled of the heavies at the moment, but I wouldn't expect anyone who is knowledgeable about this sport to call him "great" based on his career thus far. If he unifies, a feat which he is is certainly capable of, and defends the title in this weak division for a couple of years without ending up on his ass in every fight he just may be remembered as a great fighter. Not an ATG by any stretch of the imagination, but good.

[ZeIronOne]

no he wont, hes a good fighter but far from great and will be remembered accordingly

[kallsop]

Vlad who? We forgot already.