Tweet
Both win and both do have skills. Both are athletic beasts for their division.
However who is more exciting
However who is more exciting
-
-
I'll take Rigo for a thousand. -
I prefer running over hugging.Comment
-
Rigo is way more exciting.
In his relevant fights Wlad outpoints (see Haye) and/or out-clinches (Povketin) his opponent, Rigondeaux utterly schooled Donaire.
The Cuban has a better technique, better fondamentals, better footwork and takes more risks than Wlad, even though he tends to "coast to victory" a bit too early in some cases.
Klitschko on the other hand doesn't manage to look good or spectacular against guys like Wach or Pianeta that, with all due respect, don't belong at that level and shouldn't have been options for a title fight.
(And don't give me the "my brother's already fought that guy" excuse)Comment
-
Rigo doesn't throw a grabbing/clinching/holding on for dear life/borderline gay p orn display hissy fit on the inside. /end thread.Last edited by jas; 02-15-2014, 06:01 AM.Comment
-
Both have some similarities but since I like Wlad more(watching more of his fights), I'll go with Wlad.Comment
-
Do you mean who is less boring???
Rigo is , for the first few rounds. Then it gets a little boring since he doesn't know how to do anything else.
Wlad is just painful to watch.
I'd take the feeling of being in a dark room and then being hit directly with sunlight for 20 minutes >>>>> Watching that big ass modaphuka clinch and hold and panic when he is hit.Comment
-
Rigo can dance circles around anyone and make em miss, but that's not illegal or gives him an unfair illegal advantage but when I see Klinchko leaning on someone on the klinches he loves so much, and putting his whole weight on the smaller guy every two damn seconds I wish I could reach in the tv and slap the fking ref ....Boring does not describe it well enough it's beyond that.Comment
Comment