Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao-Bradley Rematch: Advanced NSAC Testing Set

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • they probably didnt like how VADA supposedly mishandled Rios.

    Comment


    • First time during his welterweight journey Pacquiao wasn't on juice against 40 year old lightweight,

      Outcome...

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Ray* View Post
        Typical Arum, how and why would a commission tell you that? Just typical...
        They're the commission. They make the rules and want control. An outside organization doing something they should be doing in the first place makes them look bad.

        They're also still mad at VADA for not sharing Peterson's A sample results with them as soon as VADA knew it was positive.
        Last edited by DoktorSleepless; 02-14-2014, 06:59 PM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
          It is strange how USADA has never blood tested Floyd less than two weeks out from a fight.

          USADA don't ratio isotope all their samples.

          This testing from Pacquiao and Bradley is at a very high standard but not quite as good a Donaire, who does 365 random VADA testing.
          You're a complete and utter ****sucker. What happened to vada being the gold standard? The sad thing is you are just like every other fringe pac fan. You cosigned vada and now you do this. Pathetic

          Comment


          • Originally posted by PowerFlow View Post
            I LOVE Timmy. But he did not win that fight.
            You should not reply to the poster in red because they either ******ed, idiot, floydiot alt, thick skinned moron or dumb as prick.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by BUNGALOWS View Post
              Who has the better legacy, Manny or Floyd?

              Last time I checked, Manny was up by 200 votes in the Manny/Floyd legacy thread. Then it got taken down.
              that's cuz most people don't know **** about boxing.

              Let's be honest... dude lost 3 times to Marquez and was only fighting in welterweight division slow flatfooted turtles past brutal defeats such as Cotto (got smashed by Margarito) Margarito (been ****d by like a 50 year old counted out Shane Mosley) Rios (lost to journeyman Alvarado) Hatton (been outclassed by Floyd) battered stiff De La Hoya, battered stiff Mosley etc.

              Pacquiao got only 2 decent opponents during his welterweight journey - JMM, Bradley... outcome - 2 defeats.

              So is that a 'Fighter of the Decade'?... the guy who was just literally smashed via vicious KO by a 40 year old lightweight?... jeez, don't make me laugh.
              Motha****az called Nonito Donaire a p4p boxer of the year. But have u seen him fighting Rigondeaux straight after this **** and what actually happens? Dude was schooled like an amateur and totally exposed by significant "underdog".
              That's what am talking about pal... most people don't know **** about boxing.

              Mayweather got 4 current opponents off top 10 p4p during his welterweight career - Hatton (been top 10 p4p, undefeated) Guerrero (been top 10 p4p) Alvarez (been top 10 p4p, undefeated) JMM (been top 10 p4p, the guy who defeats Pacquiao via spectacular vicious KO of the year)... and all of them were schooled and outclassed in onesided performance by Masta.

              Pacquaio has never been a p4p number 1.
              p4p number 1 by beating who?... old stiffs and guys who'd just been smashed straight before they faced him?

              Pacquiao as a welterweight = overhyped Arum's fraud.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by sugarsmosley View Post
                you're right it probably isn't, sad thing is a minority of idiots believe that VADA is the messiah and savior of clean fighting and nobody has ever tested postive with it. i know for a fact if pacman wins the same 3 idiots will be spamming youtube and NSB with there novels dedicated to discrediting pacman, even if it means spending there life work on it.
                It's proven to work. This other crap is some bunk that Arum help to put together. Bradley will likely use VADA as well to prove a point.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by DonMega View Post
                  TB didnt have any complaints about the NSAC testing for JMM so maybe the testing isnt all that bad......
                  Yes he did. He wanted VADA testing, but Marquez didn't. He may not be complaining because this fight means a lot more to him, but he does want the testing.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by straightleft View Post
                    you should not reply to the poster in red because they either ******ed, idiot, floydiot alt, thick skinned moron or dumb as prick.
                    or maybe they are in the red because lame posters like you who are green as soon as you get a responce on your comment and get offended send red k's....hmmmmmmm

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by sugarsmosley View Post
                      you're right it probably isn't, sad thing is a minority of idiots believe that VADA is the messiah and savior of clean fighting and nobody has ever tested postive with it. i know for a fact if pacman wins the same 3 idiots will be spamming youtube and NSB with there novels dedicated to discrediting pacman, even if it means spending there life work on it.
                      While VADA has "caught" fighters, I am not a fan of them. Berto's, as VADA admitted, positive result was consistent with contamination, Rios had very unprofessional looking testing, ( even when applying for a job they let me piss in a bathroom) and Peterson has a medical condition. Just because someone is convicted doesn't mean a trial was the best, or even fair for that matter. If that was the case the Salem witch hunts would be the model for the world.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP