Huh? You want a tall lengthy soutpaw that can beat Mayweather?

[FrenchDeLaHoya]

austin rivers has a better chance than austin trout
austin texas has a better chance then austin trout. nd that didnt even make sense!
trouts garbage my friend, he looked liked raw sewage against lara

[bluebeam]

Lets be real, it's a reason why Mayweather has not fought the Paul Williams, and those big taller African American fighters.

He's knows that hits would sound off.

Nobody fought paul williams at 147. not pacquiao, not cotto, not mosley. so throw that argument out of the window. i agree that a tall rangy boxer would give floyd a good test, but austin trout is not that fighter.


Erislandy Lara maybe

[Doctor_Tenma]

The guy who throws punches way out of range because he's scared to get hit, that guy of all people.

[Rocky Rode]

Do you know Diego Corrales ?

Not that this mattters, but I'm pretty sure Corrales was half Colombian and half Mexican... He wasn't African-American

[twrx]

Not that this mattters, but I'm pretty sure Corrales was half Colombian and half Mexican... He wasn't African-American

His dad was African- american and mom Mexican

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

You mean Lara right? Lara does everything way better than Trout. Speed, power, boxing and not sure about range. But Lara does use his range better than Trout.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[umop-ap!sdn]

Is this post forreal??? My eyes have betrayed me. What am i seeing??

[M Bison]

Austin Trout is still that guy, sure he lost against Lara and Canelo.
Austin Trout still has better footspeed, hand speed, chin and more accuracy than Amir Khan.

And im opinion he beat Canelo, so to me he's really at 1 loss if we count unoffical wins.

I still wouldn't put it against Trout!

Inb4 Mayweather reads your comment and adds Austin Trout into the poll to save his skin from the sure beating he'd receive off Amir 'King' Khan.

[M Bison]

You mean Lara right? Lara does everything way better than Trout. Speed, power, boxing and not sure about range. But Lara does use his range better than Trout.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

Trout would be an easy whooping boy for someone like Mayweather, he didn't use the benefits of his reach against short guys like Miguel Cotto.

Lara on the other hand would make the fight really boring...
Can you or anyone ever remember Mayweather having to chase a fighter down whom had good footwork?

I'm not sure how good Floyd is in that aspect of cutting off the ring, you can have good footwork doesn't mean you'll necessarily be good at cutting off the ring, hmmm who knows its all speculation and we all know Lara is a game opponent for Floyd due to the clash of styles.

[DeadLikeMe]

Trout still has it. People on here want to **** all over Trout to discredit Alvarez (to discredit Floyd). Lara is a very skilled and very athletic fighter. There is no shame in losing to him at all.