Is Compubox Full of It?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nautilus
    ...
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2004
    • 6083
    • 402
    • 761
    • 13,468

    #1

    Is Compubox Full of It?

    The Compubox system is a "computerized" system for counting punches (jabs and power punches, landed and missed). The computerization means that a couple of bozos sit and punch some buttons, and a computer counts the number of times various buttons have been pressed. This must mean that compubox can be grossly inacurate and unreliable. What is your opinion?
  • moy22487
    The silent poster
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2005
    • 3257
    • 99
    • 51
    • 9,856

    #2
    Originally posted by Nautilus
    The Compubox system is a "computerized" system for counting punches (jabs and power punches, landed and missed). The computerization means that a couple of bozos sit and punch some buttons, and a computer counts the number of times various buttons have been pressed. This must mean that compubox can be grossly inacurate and unreliable. What is your opinion?
    judges never see it so it doesnt affect the outcome

    Comment

    • grayfist
      Just old, not wise
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2004
      • 2611
      • 152
      • 303
      • 9,016

      #3
      To me, Compubox ranks down there alongside Olympic boxing's computerized scoring.

      That said, I like it sometimes because I also like a lot of chilli; sometimes.

      Comment

      • MEXICOLOVES RSL
        Banned
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Feb 2006
        • 25
        • 5
        • 0
        • 53

        #4
        Originally posted by Nautilus
        The Compubox system is a "computerized" system for counting punches (jabs and power punches, landed and missed). The computerization means that a couple of bozos sit and punch some buttons, and a computer counts the number of times various buttons have been pressed. This must mean that compubox can be grossly inacurate and unreliable. What is your opinion?
        Just like what the other poster said. It's the same thing as Olympic scoring.

        Comment

        • hitmanhomey
          Amateur
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Feb 2006
          • 22
          • 1
          • 0
          • 6,341

          #5
          "Compubox" is ******ed, and not "computerized scoring" at all. It's exactly the same thing as three guys sitting there with pen and paper and tallying up the punches. Moreover, they miss half the shots. Maybe somebody could develop software that really did look at the digital feed and count the punches, but it ain't happened yet so it's false advertising to call this "computerized scoring." On another note: I'm not sure how they do it now, but if--and that's a big if--they could get impartial guys to count punches, they should have two sets of three and have each set count the scoring punches landed by one of the fighters. (I've noticed that it's damned hard to count the scoring blows landed by both guys at the same time).

          Comment

          • The Fix
            ...
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2004
            • 18505
            • 1,009
            • 585
            • 33,792

            #6
            they should get that **** tennis does.... where they have a computer replay to see where the ball landed. it would be much more effective than anything around.

            Comment

            • THE REAL NINJA
              Undisputed Champ
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Sep 2005
              • 12376
              • 686
              • 1,093
              • 21,729

              #7
              yes it is full of numbers...yeah but i like to see that kind of stuff ...even if it's BS at times

              Comment

              • mr.thraz
                BOXING PURIST
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Oct 2004
                • 408
                • 38
                • 104
                • 7,019

                #8
                ah... guys its a little more than that.

                the computer part comes from a computer hooked up to
                all six punch counters that the three people hold.


                they all face a different side of the ring and count punches
                thrown and punches landed.

                the computer then trys to see if the guys press the bottens at the same time

                any two guys pushing the butten within a few millseconds of eachother counts as a punch.


                so its really about avrage punches, not really every punch thrown and landed.

                compubox does it the same way exept they have guys there to count jabs and thats all they do, and another set of guys count power punches.


                anyway its all really cool when you see these guys count, they look really ****** pushing their buttons like thier playing a video game.

                the problem is people can be bought and people are a part of the system,


                the answer should be the same in all currupt aspects of boxing... stop having people who are supper rich and have a vested interest in the outcome of the fight appoint officals,

                just like you should stop promoters from bidding on these fights
                and effctively becoming the boss of the organistion sactionning the bout.

                Comment

                • blockhead
                  the E-enlightened
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 5073
                  • 294
                  • 350
                  • 12,103

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Nautilus
                  The Compubox system is a "computerized" system for counting punches (jabs and power punches, landed and missed). The computerization means that a couple of bozos sit and punch some buttons, and a computer counts the number of times various buttons have been pressed. This must mean that compubox can be grossly inacurate and unreliable. What is your opinion?
                  if compubox mattered b-hop would have won both of the taylor fights by large margins. so i dont know if it would be good or bad if it was a consideration for the judging of a fight.

                  Comment

                  • JMCbulls
                    JMC
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2005
                    • 1205
                    • 90
                    • 190
                    • 7,730

                    #10
                    i agree, it often seems theyre way off

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP