Bradley has too much pride to admit he lost. I just hope the judges are not messed up for the rematch.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Bradley: No Way Pacquiao Won, I Won 8-4 in Rounds!
Collapse
-
[QUOTE=JLBlades;14206773]
So by showing a punchstat that proves something ? Punch stats are never accurate . For example in the broner malinaggi fight malinaggi clearly outworked him , threw and landed way more punches and the punch stat was way off and theg gave the fight to broner ? Never trust punch stats watch the actual fight and pay attention don't go for who is the more flashy fighter but who does what is necessary to win .
its like saying pac man did enough to win the 3rd marquez fight which majority of the boxing fans know that he didnt win that fight . People need to give credit where its due . Bradley deserves it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Derranged View PostIts rare that a fighter admits that his opponent should have gotten the decision when he didn't.
Regardless, Bradley, you got a gift and Pacquaio was lazy that night. If he turned on the jets you likely would've been stopped.
Comment
-
Bradley beat the crap out of Pacroid and the judges made the right call. If commentators stop going into a fight saying their favorite guy has already won and just score the fight round for round as its being fought people would see just how Bradley won. Ole Lampley was screaming that every punch Pacroid threw landed. He was claiming Pacroid was landing shots during the break between rounds. I watched the fight and it was very easy to score if you dont listen to the hbo commentators. All this effective aggression is B.S., if you aren't landing punches then you're losing. ... Pacroid lost, now Manny you can go back to ducking Floyd unless you decide to take the test.....
Comment
-
what a delusional young man. first this guy ducked amir khan blatantly and even used the words "what if i lose". now he is acting like he actually beat pacquiao? delusional.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingWizard69 View Post
So by showing a punchstat that proves something ? Punch stats are never accurate . For example in the broner malinaggi fight malinaggi clearly outworked him , threw and landed way more punches and the punch stat was way off and theg gave the fight to broner ? Never trust punch stats watch the actual fight and pay attention don't go for who is the more flashy fighter but who does what is necessary to win .
its like saying pac man did enough to win the 3rd marquez fight which majority of the boxing fans know that he didnt win that fight . People need to give credit where its due . Bradley deserves it.
The 3rd Marquez fight was a very close fight, and I can see people giving the nod to Marquez. The Bradley-Pac match wasn't close. If you want to believe otherwise, that's fine, but there's nothing you can say to me that will change my mind, especially making up your own punch stats.Last edited by JLBlades; 02-05-2014, 07:54 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by oneon11 View PostBradley beat the crap out of Pacroid and the judges made the right call. If commentators stop going into a fight saying their favorite guy has already won and just score the fight round for round as its being fought people would see just how Bradley won. Ole Lampley was screaming that every punch Pacroid threw landed. He was claiming Pacroid was landing shots during the break between rounds. I watched the fight and it was very easy to score if you dont listen to the hbo commentators. All this effective aggression is B.S., if you aren't landing punches then you're losing. ... Pacroid lost, now Manny you can go back to ducking Floyd unless you decide to take the test.....
Go learn abt boxing.. u need it
Comment
-
Comment
Comment