Okay the Maidana story may be a little interesting, but Maidana doesn't stand a chance and yes, Khan will put up a better fight even though he may not deserve it.. It's all about money and Khan brings more to the table in terms of competition, and popularity.
Floyd is just trying to come off like Broner did and appealing to fans by letting them choose his fight. However it seems as though the vast majority have seen this isn't the case because 1. He has limited all opponents down to two. 2. One of those guys is someone that 99.99% of fans don't care for him to fight and 3. The other is someone that we all know won't do the same job as he did to Broner.
It's BS and we all know it. As one or two people have said, it seems as though he is doing this to either make his choice of opponent look good in comparison to the other (Maidana being a better fight that Khan, for example) OR possibly take the 'don't blame me, the fans have spoken' angle (If on the other hand, Khan is the one that gets it)
After all the backlash the chances of a Khan fight has received, its BS of Floyd to give him as an option alongside ONE other...But certain fans will eat it up and respect him for acting like he has left it to the fans.
I voted for Maidana because he is the more exciting fight, and the hype of the month here. I prefer Porter or Thurman more because they would be the much harder fights.
Comment