Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How come missing your punches = you lose in a fight?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by jas View Post
    1. Clean punching (power versus quantity).
    2. Effective aggressiveness.
    3. Ring generalship.
    4. Defense.

    So in that scenario, clean punching is EVEN. effective agressiveness is both 0. defense has to go the guy making the other guy miss! and ring generalship to that guy also !!!!!
    Ok so let's just get rid of the 1 and 2 altogether since they cancel out. So now we have a guy throwing and missing against a guy basically running away. Punch stats would be 0/999 to 0/0. I'd still give it to the guy missing and throwing. This is boxing after all, you're supposed to punch.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by !! Shawn View Post

      Bradley after Pacquiao



      Looks to me like Pacquiao didn't actually land any punches...
      sounds racist to me but you cannot compare bradley to those guys. ..


      pac also seems like he just came from a 5 mile jog. did tim never landed anything on him also? does tim win because he had no black eye?

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by straightleft View Post
        Some people thought Pac lost against Bradley and their reason Pac was missing his punches against Bradley but then Pac out landed him in punch stat department almost by half. Take note, most of those punches were meaningful shots vs Bradley at most arms grazing and hitting gloves. Watch the video below and see for yourself.



        Pac can't miss his left hand against Bradley from round 1 to 12 and was kicking his ass. Then if you look closely, clearly it was Bradley who was missing a lot of his shots.
        LOL! Pacman was kicking his ass from pillar to post. Anybody who had Bradley won this fight should be shot to the head.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by straightleft View Post
          Some people thought Pac lost against Bradley and their reason Pac was missing his punches against Bradley but then Pac out landed him in punch stat department almost by half. Take note, most of those punches were meaningful shots vs Bradley at most arms grazing and hitting gloves. Watch the video below and see for yourself.



          Pac can't miss his left hand against Bradley from round 1 to 12 and was kicking his ass. Then if you look closely, clearly it was Bradley who was missing a lot of his shots.
          Bradly just got whupped those who think Bradley won are dumber than the word Dumb

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma View Post
            Pathetic video, goes to show how effective Bradley's defense was.
            But where was Bradley's Offense ?

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Grimgash View Post
              Wrong, the only thing looked at when judging a fight is NOT punches landed. There's more to it than that.
              scoring fights is simple

              number of punches + taking account of damage

              ring generalship etc are things you ONLY take into account when the punches/damage is seemingly equal

              ******s always trying to make it more complicated than it really is

              "oh but he moved around the ring" "oh he made him miss"
              reaching is what it is

              Comment


              • #27
                Didn't HBO have some sort of special that inadvertently showed how horrible CompuBox was for that fight?

                Comment


                • #28
                  I thought Manny won the fight.The problem with compubox is it counts punches landed. roun ds are not just scored this way. The guy who lands the most punches could only win 4 or 5 rounds. If he loses the other rounds he loses the fight.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    The judges should count the weigh-in when scoring. They would have selected the real winner of Mayweather v. Canelo.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma View Post
                      Pathetic video, goes to show how effective Bradley's defense was.
                      lmfao................

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP