Monetary wise? Sure. Both Lara and Molina are much better fights by far.
Better fighters? Definitely, but not better fights. Canelo's not champ anymore so i dont mind if hes not taking on the biggest challanges at all times, id rather see him fight a solid fighter like angulo in an entertaining fight than lara whos a step above in a boring fight
I don't know why people complain about this being a PPV. If you don't like it, don't buy it. The way I see it is even if it does 50K PPV buys, Canelo probably gets paid more money than he would fighting on regular Showtime, so why not just start with the PPVs now?
This is indeed that it is the better fight than a Lara or Molina but it is not ppv material.
Not being a smarta$$ but you think Floyd vs Khan is PPV worthy? To top it off at a price of $70 plus tax. I do agree tho that Canelo-Angulo shouldn't be PPV. Especially with both boxers coming off losses.
Canelo won't do 250k in PPV buys, he may be a big draw in San Antonio when the tickets are 4 for $25.00. But this is PPV and people with good sense will say, why pay to see a guy fight who just had his butt handed to him by an aging fighter. Canelo is going to lose anyway a d he'll be another hype job exposed like Nonito was against Rigo...........
tickets were given for a toy on the broner maidana fight, and that had an undercard stacked, still they couldnt put half the people that canelo did, he is a draw and the reason floyd had 2.2mil on his last ppv, canelo will do ok on his ppv and will win, but you will still hate...
Comment