Manny Pacquiao vs. Timothy Bradley II: who will win?

[HeroBando]

the 3rd fight of pac vs jmm. the pro pac crowed boo'd loudly and threw bottles at pac. even though everyone felt jmm won, it still goes down in the history books as a loss for jmm. just like the fight of pac vs tim. plus the judge that had pac beating tim only had pac by one round. you make it seem like the fight was a shut out victory for pac and the judges screwed him. not the case at all the score that close could have gone either way, it went timmys way and again this was on 2 severely sprained ankles so the fight should have been a cake walk for pac insted of a close fight.

Hey jacka$$ you're wrong on everything and I've shown you the links with press row scores before. To jog your memory jmm3 was near 50/50 with average score 114 114. Bradley was 100/1 with average score 117 111

[bojangles1987]

It's completely dependent on two things; what does Pacquiao have left, and will he enter this fight with any motivation?

I would hope a chance for revenge facing the fighter he was robbed against would take care of the motivation. So we're left to wonder what Pac has left.

[Pain~Lucy]

and the new!

[John Barron]

if bradley picks up where he left off it will be another victory.

[GOD-FR33]

Exactly.

Exactly. Don't you just HATE bogus fanboys on this site? The reason WHY Manny beats Marquez every time is that, he outpunches and outlands him. Marquez simply isn't busy enough because he is this "cute" counter puncher who tries to be perfect all the time. Manny is the busier fighter. PERIOD. In the 4th fight, the only mistake Manny made was not testing Roidquez. We all know that he has never been stronger than Manny, then all of a sudden, he has one punch power? WHY did he even hire AH? Only REAL boxing purists know why Manny lost that fight. How did dude even take all of those hard shots to get to the 5th round? Hmmmmmm.........

[Rome-By-Ko]

It's completely dependent on two things; what does Pacquiao have left, and will he enter this fight with any motivation?

I would hope a chance for revenge facing the fighter he was robbed against would take care of the motivation. So we're left to wonder what Pac has left.

Bo you my dude,but this excuse is weak as hell..So either something is wrong with Pac,or he wins..Does not sound like you leaving any room to give Bradley credit should he win..

[bojangles1987]

Bo you my dude,but this excuse is weak as hell..So either something is wrong with Pac,or he wins..Does not sound like you leaving any room to give Bradley credit should he win..

Based on the first fight, what else am I left to believe? Pacquiao is clearly better and will win if he has as much left as he did the first time.

It doesn't change that Bradley will have beaten a top 10 p4per and one of the best fighters in the sport if we acknowledge that Pacquiao will probably have to be worse this time for Bradley to win.

[Rome-By-Ko]

"Very inaccurate" is overstating it. He isn't James Toney but I wouldn't use that phrase. I'd describe him as a "busy" fighter if anything and he likes to hide hard shots in between those occasionally-wild flurries. I also wouldn't say that he has no power. He hits hard enough.

I think you're focusing a little too hard on his negatives and overlooking the good. Bradley is a well-conditioned, experienced champion just hitting his prime. He has excellent footwork, fast hands and most important, shows the ability to adjust. That was a very intelligent fight he fought against Marquez, outboxing him is no easy task. The plan will be to do the same to Manny and he is capable. And his inside game is also underrated.

This is an excellent matchup at the right time. It's hard to say what it'll mean legacy-wise until everything unfolds but it appears to have major implications. If Manny pulls out one last great performance that would be a huge boon and fitting finale to a storied career. It wouldn't shock me to see him rise from the ashes but I think the smart money is on the younger, hungrier fighter winning far more decisively this time.

I think this is the way a lot of people get their take on Bradley..Seeing the positive things means giving him credit..Which most do not wanna do..Sad but true..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Based on the first fight, what else am I left to believe? Pacquiao is clearly better and will win if he has as much left as he did the first time.

It doesn't change that Bradley will have beaten a top 10 p4per and one of the best fighters in the sport if we acknowledge that Pacquiao will probably have to be worse this time for Bradley to win.

We're your going wrong is that Bradley already beat him,on two bad ankles none the less..If he beats him again,he just has the style to trouble him..You not feeling Bradley beat Pac is your opinion and ya right..In reality tho,Bradley already beat Pac,and it's Pac who has to right the ship,not Bradley..

[HeroBando]

We're your going wrong is that Bradley already beat him,on two bad ankles none the less..If he beats him again,he just has the style to trouble him..You not feeling Bradley beat Pac is your opinion and ya right..In reality tho,Bradley already beat Pac,and it's Pac who has to right the ship,not Bradley..

Nobody takes you serious dude. Not only on this topic, Andy Lee > Bika lmao