Tweet
...When we talk about active fighters.
That thread about Golovkin and Canelo's respective resumes got me thinking. Most of those replies bash on those guys resume, and in my opinion, it's a bit unfair.
I'm strictly discussing current active fighters, I think when people discuss them, they subconsciously compare them to established legends like Leonard and Duran which is of course unfair because these guys are still building their legacies.
I'm not saying that GGG or Canelo could ever be as great as Duran or Leonard, but still we should have some sort of different way of analyzing between active fighters and legends.
We should compare active fighters resume to other active fighters not past ATGS, and if you look at it that way, GGG and Canelo ain't that bad.
As you could probably tell English is not my first language, so I may not explain things as well as I could have.
That thread about Golovkin and Canelo's respective resumes got me thinking. Most of those replies bash on those guys resume, and in my opinion, it's a bit unfair.
I'm strictly discussing current active fighters, I think when people discuss them, they subconsciously compare them to established legends like Leonard and Duran which is of course unfair because these guys are still building their legacies.
I'm not saying that GGG or Canelo could ever be as great as Duran or Leonard, but still we should have some sort of different way of analyzing between active fighters and legends.
We should compare active fighters resume to other active fighters not past ATGS, and if you look at it that way, GGG and Canelo ain't that bad.
As you could probably tell English is not my first language, so I may not explain things as well as I could have.
Comment