khan vs broner at 147 who wins.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jewish-Reptile
    COLD HEARTBREAKER
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 10708
    • 922
    • 1,095
    • 15,382

    #21
    Easy nights work for Khan.as long as their was a strong referee who wouldn't stand for Broner's persistent pushing,fouling,clinching leading with the forearm.that said a khan pushes just as much if not more than Broner.but he's clearly the dirtier boxer and his tactics reek of desperation.
    I'll never forget him rolling around on the canvass looking for a way out against Chino.he looked pathetic.

    Comment

    • The Surgeon
      Days Of Glory
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2006
      • 15385
      • 712
      • 1,578
      • 24,784

      #22
      Khan on points is my feeling. His jab and fast combinations keep AB's hands at home and his faster feet make Broner look like a lost plodder in there looking to land one big shot

      Comment

      • UTEP
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2006
        • 12078
        • 620
        • 599
        • 27,204

        #23
        Khan by points, unless he gets tapped on the chin of course. If Julio Diaz had him doing the stanky leg Broner could definitely knock him out, if he lands flush.

        Comment

        • Joe Grizzley
          Banned
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Feb 2013
          • 717
          • 168
          • 43
          • 6,383

          #24
          Originally posted by IST-ra-GLEr2
          both arguably untested in the welterweight division.

          both hardly elites.

          who you got.
          Khan wins easy.

          Comment

          • Bushbaby
            Wild Apache
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 23513
            • 727
            • 370
            • 32,078

            #25
            Broner wins easily. He matches Khan in speed, has more accuracy and is simply all around the tougher of the 2. Until proven otherwise I wouldn't pick khan over any slightly better than average welterweight.

            Comment

            • toshmurph
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2012
              • 1439
              • 69
              • 122
              • 7,813

              #26
              Originally posted by LacedUp
              Khan.

              And he'll make it look easy.
              It's been a heck of a long time since Khan made any fight look easy!!

              Comment

              • jwheels9876
                Banned
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Dec 2013
                • 350
                • 22
                • 1
                • 430

                #27
                Originally posted by Bushbaby
                Broner wins easily. He matches Khan in speed, has more accuracy and is simply all around the tougher of the 2. Until proven otherwise I wouldn't pick khan over any slightly better than average welterweight.
                I think is more active,has faster hands, better footwork and has been in with way better guys.
                Broner can't beat any of the top 5-6 welterweights I'm guessing. He'd probably lose to Garcia,Provo and Matthysee at 140 as well. Unless he can take a shot then he could beat Matthysee.

                Comment

                • Bushbaby
                  Wild Apache
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 23513
                  • 727
                  • 370
                  • 32,078

                  #28
                  Originally posted by jwheels9876
                  I think is more active,has faster hands, better footwork and has been in with way better guys.
                  Broner can't beat any of the top 5-6 welterweights I'm guessing. He'd probably lose to Garcia,Provo and Matthysee at 140 as well. Unless he can take a shot then he could beat Matthysee.
                  And Khan can beat the top 5-6 welterweights?? Please.

                  How do you know Khan has faster hands??

                  Khan has better footwork?? He most definitely does not. Khan has atrocious footwork. Some thee most horrible of any praised fighter.

                  I may have understood you incorrectly. But it seems like you believe Provo is better than Lucas, a strange assumption.

                  Comment

                  • LacedUp
                    Still Smokin'
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 29171
                    • 781
                    • 381
                    • 132,163

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Bushbaby
                    Broner wins easily. He matches Khan in speed, has more accuracy and is simply all around the tougher of the 2. Until proven otherwise I wouldn't pick khan over any slightly better than average welterweight.
                    Predictable answer.

                    Broner matches Khan for speed.. lol

                    Originally posted by toshmurph
                    It's been a heck of a long time since Khan made any fight look easy!!
                    It's also been a heck of a long time since he fought someone as flatfooted and light punching like Broner.

                    Comment

                    • Dean_Razorback
                      God of Thunder and R n' R
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2013
                      • 16558
                      • 1,023
                      • 395
                      • 98,048

                      #30
                      broner by KO, i can't see khan winning any significant fight at this point, not after that awful fight against diaz

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP