Comments Thread For: Roach Says Pacquiao-Bradley II Could Be Real Stinker

[megadeth]

He has been saying stuff like this for years but people are always bias and try to downplay what he says. Like the time he said he didn't want Manny to fight Mosley because he destroyed Margarito. Then he had the nerve to say that he would only fight him at a CW of 142 pounds. Then flip the switch because Mosley look like he was on his way out after he fought Mora. Don't try to act like these guys are any different then Mayweather. They know careful matchmaking very well.

I'm sorry, but they are MUCH worse than Mayweather. At least he is catching his opponents coming off of HUGE wins. The same can't be said for Pac.

[bojangles1987]

Shut up, Roach.

[Nomadic]

It would be, because Bradley is not a slow moving punching bag like Pac's last opponent.

[skinnystev]

any fight you put manny in is gonna be a stinker

[rocktx]

Roach needs to shut his old azz up. He knows they might lose a decision again. He sounds like most people on here who just want to see some dumb fighter who likes to get in and throw a bunch of punches and take even more in the process.

This is boxing not street fighting, if Pac can't adjust to Bradley's style then he's not the better boxer. If he is the better boxer get back in with Bradley and prove it.

You couldn't get away with being a "boring" fighter back in the day because the exciting fighters were also good boxers and they knew how to do simple things like cut the ring off!. Exciting fighters today can't really box and thats why they can easily get caught up in a boring fight

[dc3383]

Roach would rather Manny beat a past Floyd opponent better like its 2009 again.

[rasdun]

any fight you put manny in is gonna be a stinker

yeah bc Manny is never is exciting fights (Cotto, Marquez 1-4, Morales 1-3, etc.) LMFAO

[cornholioda3rd]

lmao, yes the great Tim Bradley. The legend.

You don't need to be a legend to box a past prime Pacquiao.

[Daveros]

any fight you put manny in is gonna be a stinker

rightttttttttt!

How many of Pacs fights did you actually watch???

cotto? morales? margarito? hatton? de la hoya? marquez 1-4?

now lets compare that to mayweather....

im stuggling to even name a decent fight, de la hoya possibly, though it wasnt great. Hatton fight had floyd holding far too much.

The only fight that floyd was in anyway entertaining was the Ortiz fight... and we all know how that ended.

[2120]

Stinker fight or not, Pacquiao is looking for Bradley next. They have Provo talking like he's ready to fight Manny, to get Bradley down in money. Provo and PAC are close friends and not fighting each other no matter what. They know Marquez and Mayweather are afraid to climb in with Manny. Bradley is the no brainer that happens.

nonsense. Marquez is pacs daddy

Marquez arguably won the first 3 fights


http://********/kMUaI4qblLY


and the Marquez IV was build as once for all and im sure you remember how that ended. check the sig below for a reference

and floyd vs pac? its both of their fault. take it from a hater of both. I love it when pac fans rip floyd for his catch weight advantage he didnt need against against weak ass canelo.

but generally floyd fans are winning the floyd vs pac debate. first off pac should have took the test no cut off dates. and now that pac has taking vada testing, plus the stadium excuse.

i dont know where pacfans get the nerve to say floyd is ducking pac.


floyd did retire to avoid margocheato and cotto (remember he is from puerto rico) could have fought martinez but he said he didnt do catch weights (canelo) but when it comes to floyd vs pac it looks like pacfans have no legs to stand on