Roach says bradley wants too much money and might run all night

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You have got to be kidding, I've heard Khan fans act as if Prescott and Peterson don't own a part of Khans ass..That's the real joke..

What does that even mean?

[Rome-By-Ko]

Thanks, I actually said in the other thread that he is worth up to $10m to Pac, just to get it over with.

I don't agree with anyone thinking that this rematch won't sell. Maybe a year ago it won't, but with everything since, it'll sell and it'll sell better than the first fight.

I completely agree bro..

[Hougigo]

If this is some kind of reference to Khan then I never said he earned the Mayweather fight so try another angle.

Nope, not khan

[Rome-By-Ko]

What does that even mean?

Not a surprise you would not comprehend it..Keep raking your brain..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Not a surprise you would not comprehend it..Keep raking your brain..

Yeah I'm sure i'll need to engage all my brain power to understand what having a piece of somebody's ass means.

I believe that is a technical term in boxing.

[Fetta]

to bad Team Pac is ducking Bradley. Its a good fight and really his only fight

[Dirk Diggler UK]

In other words, we can't beat fighters unless they are tailor made for us.

Well he already beat Bradley so I don't think its about beating him. They definitely want Pacquaio to look good though and he'd get a knockout against Provodnikov.

[nveleven]

No rational person could give Bradley more than 4 rounds scoring that fight objectively. But what's funny is to hear the Bradley apologists saying stuff like: "it will be interesting to see what Bradley does with two good legs", as if Pac's speed, footwork and awkward angles didn't have anything to do with Bradley leaving in a wheelchair. That's the equivalent of getting juked by a crossover and saying: "that wouldn't have happened if I hadn't fallen down"
PAC-Bradley was about as interesting as May-Guerrero. A rematch to 'avenge' the loss is absurd

[Fetta]

No rational person could give Bradley more than 4 rounds scoring that fight objectively. But what's funny is to hear the Bradley apologists saying stuff like: "it will be interesting to see what Bradley does with two good legs", as if Pac's speed, footwork and awkward angles didn't have anything to do with Bradley leaving in a wheelchair. That's the equivalent of getting juked by a crossover and saying: "that wouldn't have happened if I hadn't fallen down"
PAC-Bradley was about as interesting as May-Guerrero. A rematch to 'avenge' the loss is absurd

a loss is a loss. Chavez got outboxed by Pernell back in day but went down as draw and not many remember the robbery and just see the draw. This will be the same way. Plus who else is he going to fight? The ESPN staple Ruslan or try to bring Guerrero who you already dont like

[ShoulderRoll]

Well he already beat Bradley so I don't think its about beating him.

The judges didn't think he beat Bradley.