Writer said regarding Wlad: "To me, he’s the fifth-best heavyweight since Clay beat Liston. "
You can't be serious...
How is that statement ludicrous at all? Are there really more than 5 HWs in the last 50 years that you would pick to beat a prime Wlad? If the criteria is accomplishments, certainly Wlad has had a greater reign than all but Ali and the Easton Assassin.
How is that statement ludicrous at all? Are there really more than 5 HWs in the last 50 years that you would pick to beat a prime Wlad? If the criteria is accomplishments, certainly Wlad has had a greater reign than all but Ali and possibly the Easton Assassin.
The "guy" (Ward) "beat out his entire division" -- namely Kessler (not so "cleanly") and Froch...
... Then "fought the best in the next weight class up"!!! Dawson? Really?
He dominated Kessler and beat Froch decisively, consensus numbers 2 and 3 in the division. He also beat Sakio Bika, Arthur Abraham, and Edwin Rodriguez while losing maybe 3-4 total rounds in the process. And yes, Dawson was the consensus best at 175 when they met. Lineal champion. Btw, Ward hasn't lost a fight since turning open in the amateurs.
Even if you believe that (which isn't crazy), the statement is not ridiculous at all. At worst, 6 prime HWs of the last 50 years might be favored against a prime Wlad (that includes Vitali). Again, you can't argue that even 3 HWs have had a better reign in that period, regardless of competition.
Comment