Comments Thread For: Holyfield in Hot Water After Anti-Gay Jab on Big Brother

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FrankieBruno
    replied
    Originally posted by mathed
    A penis is meant for things to exit, so is an ass. A vagina is meant for things to enter except a baby due to things entering a vagina. A mouth is generally meant fir things to enter to provide nourishment. I guess we can say things may enter for purposes other than nourishment but typically it is to lead to an act that would lend itself to a pro-creative act of some sort.

    All I'm saying is that body parts have a purpose and when we re-create a purpose for that part, we assume the role of the bodily creator and as far as I' m aware, we didn't create schit.
    the mouth has no use for procreation

    you need to stop yappin **** mate

    ur logic is flawed, so u gave the "pass" to the mouth because it didnt fit in with ur theory, typical wanka alert, move the goal post

    fact is humans have sex for non-procreation purposes all the time, we have sex for pleasure and to stimulate our minds and men in particular to release pent up testosterone

    ur simplistic view of human nature is just that "simplistic", we are still trying to grasp the basics of the human mind, we are still learning and evolving.
    Last edited by FrankieBruno; 01-06-2014, 12:31 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • mathed
    replied
    Originally posted by Humean
    You cannot be serious...

    I'm sure if a woman asked you for some backdoor action you would respond 'sorry but that it not congruent with natural biology....oh and neither is all that contraceptive nonsense'. Anyway I don't think you are quite up to date with your understanding of biology.
    So if a dude asked you to punch his schit in you would be ok with it too? I mean a ******** is a ******** right?

    Leave a comment:


  • mathed
    replied
    Originally posted by -Antonio-
    So you really think that Holyfield's opinion isn't affected by his religious beliefs? Really?
    I think his beliefs are heavily influenced by his religious beliefs...mine are more along the lines of a biology basis.

    Leave a comment:


  • Humean
    replied
    Originally posted by baya
    i'm interested in you elaborating on the bolded, please.
    Teleology

    Leave a comment:


  • mathed
    replied
    Originally posted by FrankieBruno
    same can be said for blow jobs though or any other sexual pleasure which is not used for procreation.

    if i am only having sex to make babies then i would have a lot of kids.
    A penis is meant for things to exit, so is an ass. A vagina is meant for things to enter except a baby due to things entering a vagina. A mouth is generally meant fir things to enter to provide nourishment. I guess we can say things may enter for purposes other than nourishment but typically it is to lead to an act that would lend itself to a pro-creative act of some sort.

    All I'm saying is that body parts have a purpose and when we re-create a purpose for that part, we assume the role of the bodily creator and as far as I' m aware, we didn't create schit.

    Leave a comment:


  • baya
    replied
    Originally posted by Humean
    You cannot be serious...

    I'm sure if a woman asked you for some backdoor action you would respond 'sorry but that it not congruent with natural biology....oh and neither is all that contraceptive nonsense'. Anyway I don't think you are quite up to date with your understanding of biology.
    i'm interested in you elaborating on the bolded, please.

    Leave a comment:


  • Humean
    replied
    Originally posted by mathed
    Putting all that biased stuff aside....an ass is meant to push feces out (bodily waste) a vagina is meant to accept a penis for pro-creation, any other use is not in congruence with natural biology....that is just what it is.
    You cannot be serious...

    I'm sure if a woman asked you for some backdoor action you would respond 'sorry but that it not congruent with natural biology....oh and neither is all that contraceptive nonsense'. Anyway I don't think you are quite up to date with your understanding of biology.

    Leave a comment:


  • -Antonio-
    replied
    Originally posted by mathed
    Well, you sound like you don't like his personal choices and want to label him a hypocrite. His viewpoint is more about what a man's body is supposed to do and a woman's body is supposed to do as opposed to his moral values. I don't necessarily agree with his choice of parenting or his value of family but a man is made to do one thing and a woman another...I would hope that most people can understand that. People can argue people are free to do whatever they want and that is one argument but what a thing is designed to do is another argument all together.
    So you really think that Holyfield's opinion isn't affected by his religious beliefs? Really?

    Leave a comment:


  • -Antonio-
    replied
    Originally posted by mathed
    Putting all that biased stuff aside....an ass is meant to push feces out (bodily waste) a vagina is meant to accept a penis for pro-creation, any other use is not in congruence with natural biology....that is just what it is.
    That is too simple minded. Is tobacco meant to be smoked? Is pig meant to be eaten?

    You can do this with anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • mathed
    replied
    Originally posted by -Antonio-
    I don't care about that show or what controversy is around it. All I'm saying is Holyfield's opinion means nothing to me anyway, and considering the fact that he is a hypocrite it makes it even worse.

    This man has cheated his sport (steroids) and has multiple kids from multiple women. He is a confused man.

    I actually like Holyfield but who cares wtf this man's stance is?
    Well, you sound like you don't like his personal choices and want to label him a hypocrite. His viewpoint is more about what a man's body is supposed to do and a woman's body is supposed to do as opposed to his moral values. I don't necessarily agree with his choice of parenting or his value of family but a man is made to do one thing and a woman another...I would hope that most people can understand that. People can argue people are free to do whatever they want and that is one argument but what a thing is designed to do is another argument all together.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
TOP