Comments Thread For: Holyfield in Hot Water After Anti-Gay Jab on Big Brother

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Antonio-
    -Antonio-
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2005
    • 24259
    • 629
    • 164
    • 38,153

    #111
    Originally posted by mathed
    Well, you sound like you don't like his personal choices and want to label him a hypocrite. His viewpoint is more about what a man's body is supposed to do and a woman's body is supposed to do as opposed to his moral values. I don't necessarily agree with his choice of parenting or his value of family but a man is made to do one thing and a woman another...I would hope that most people can understand that. People can argue people are free to do whatever they want and that is one argument but what a thing is designed to do is another argument all together.
    So you really think that Holyfield's opinion isn't affected by his religious beliefs? Really?

    Comment

    • Humean
      Infidel
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2013
      • 3054
      • 126
      • 110
      • 10,285

      #112
      Originally posted by mathed
      Putting all that biased stuff aside....an ass is meant to push feces out (bodily waste) a vagina is meant to accept a penis for pro-creation, any other use is not in congruence with natural biology....that is just what it is.
      You cannot be serious...

      I'm sure if a woman asked you for some backdoor action you would respond 'sorry but that it not congruent with natural biology....oh and neither is all that contraceptive nonsense'. Anyway I don't think you are quite up to date with your understanding of biology.

      Comment

      • baya
        Wrapidad was garbage
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2004
        • 14688
        • 807
        • 730
        • 31,790

        #113
        Originally posted by Humean
        You cannot be serious...

        I'm sure if a woman asked you for some backdoor action you would respond 'sorry but that it not congruent with natural biology....oh and neither is all that contraceptive nonsense'. Anyway I don't think you are quite up to date with your understanding of biology.
        i'm interested in you elaborating on the bolded, please.

        Comment

        • mathed
          molṑn labé
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 54549
          • 2,741
          • 2,984
          • 224,675

          #114
          Originally posted by FrankieBruno
          same can be said for blow jobs though or any other sexual pleasure which is not used for procreation.

          if i am only having sex to make babies then i would have a lot of kids.
          A penis is meant for things to exit, so is an ass. A vagina is meant for things to enter except a baby due to things entering a vagina. A mouth is generally meant fir things to enter to provide nourishment. I guess we can say things may enter for purposes other than nourishment but typically it is to lead to an act that would lend itself to a pro-creative act of some sort.

          All I'm saying is that body parts have a purpose and when we re-create a purpose for that part, we assume the role of the bodily creator and as far as I' m aware, we didn't create schit.

          Comment

          • Humean
            Infidel
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2013
            • 3054
            • 126
            • 110
            • 10,285

            #115
            Originally posted by baya
            i'm interested in you elaborating on the bolded, please.
            Teleology

            Comment

            • mathed
              molṑn labé
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 54549
              • 2,741
              • 2,984
              • 224,675

              #116
              Originally posted by -Antonio-
              So you really think that Holyfield's opinion isn't affected by his religious beliefs? Really?
              I think his beliefs are heavily influenced by his religious beliefs...mine are more along the lines of a biology basis.

              Comment

              • mathed
                molṑn labé
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 54549
                • 2,741
                • 2,984
                • 224,675

                #117
                Originally posted by Humean
                You cannot be serious...

                I'm sure if a woman asked you for some backdoor action you would respond 'sorry but that it not congruent with natural biology....oh and neither is all that contraceptive nonsense'. Anyway I don't think you are quite up to date with your understanding of biology.
                So if a dude asked you to punch his schit in you would be ok with it too? I mean a ******** is a ******** right?

                Comment

                • FrankieBruno
                  GGG spanked my mom
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 12208
                  • 320
                  • 12
                  • 22,246

                  #118
                  Originally posted by mathed
                  A penis is meant for things to exit, so is an ass. A vagina is meant for things to enter except a baby due to things entering a vagina. A mouth is generally meant fir things to enter to provide nourishment. I guess we can say things may enter for purposes other than nourishment but typically it is to lead to an act that would lend itself to a pro-creative act of some sort.

                  All I'm saying is that body parts have a purpose and when we re-create a purpose for that part, we assume the role of the bodily creator and as far as I' m aware, we didn't create schit.
                  the mouth has no use for procreation

                  you need to stop yappin **** mate

                  ur logic is flawed, so u gave the "pass" to the mouth because it didnt fit in with ur theory, typical wanka alert, move the goal post

                  fact is humans have sex for non-procreation purposes all the time, we have sex for pleasure and to stimulate our minds and men in particular to release pent up testosterone

                  ur simplistic view of human nature is just that "simplistic", we are still trying to grasp the basics of the human mind, we are still learning and evolving.
                  Last edited by FrankieBruno; 01-06-2014, 12:31 AM.

                  Comment

                  • whoseyourdaddy
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • May 2011
                    • 3127
                    • 80
                    • 0
                    • 29,608

                    #119
                    Originally posted by Mighty_Windir
                    What a bunch of hypocrites people are. They want to be treated like equals, but when someone doesn't agree or says something they might not agree with, he's a hater.

                    If someone tells me they don't agree with my style of life that's their opinion whether you take it personal or not, just shows the ignorant mentality of some people that want respect but lack to give it when someone don't agree with them.

                    You wanna be a *******? Fine. If you ask me about ******** and certain stuff that I don't agree with, don't ***** when I express my opinion.

                    Hell you could tell me you hate latinos and dislike my race and I couldn't care less.
                    Agree with you bra. For crying out loud Holyfield only stated HIS opinion people!!! ignorant? maybe but is his opinion, and a very respectable one, I respect everybody's opinion but you (gay people/supporters) are making it so hard to respect it any more. always crying bloody murder for everything and anything......with yours attitude of respect my opinion, and by your terms of respecting, you mean agree with me or you are a hatemonger is fing getting old.

                    Comment

                    • Humean
                      Infidel
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2013
                      • 3054
                      • 126
                      • 110
                      • 10,285

                      #120
                      Originally posted by mathed
                      So if a dude asked you to punch his schit in you would be ok with it too? I mean a ******** is a ******** right?
                      I'm sure that in your mind both your non-rhetorical and your rhetorical question actually make sense. Anyway the point is that your teleological explanation of biological function is a completely out of date way of thinking. You will have to do better to argue against ****sexuality than this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP