The Pacqauio has lost 2 of his last 3 fights crazy one

[killamoneymike]

I don't care if he's lost 8 of his last 10 fights, if this is the fight people wanna see, this is the fight people wanna see. Mayweather needs to stop being such a paranoid pansy about losing his 0 and just take the fight. It's obvious that's what he's worried about. This guy looks the best in boxing besides him and it wouldn't be impossible for him to beat Floyd, unlike all FLoyds other opponents. He represents more of a challenge than FLoyd is comfortable dealing with and that's that. Floyd knows thiS and that's why he's been ducking him for years. If you also buy the "Mannys with Bob Arum excuse you might be extremely gullible...smh

Edit: in my title I meant to have excuse on there...oh well

[Jam Jars]

JMM, Mosley and Bradley had to leave their promoter to get a Pacquiao fight, Arum wants a split of everything. Not an excuse just the truth.

[PAC-BOY]

So you think Bradley beat Manny?

[killamoneymike]

So you think Bradley beat Manny?

Hell no I don't. In my eyes PAC only lost 1 of his last 3 fights.

[soul_survivor]

Hell no I don't. In my eyes PAC only lost 1 of his last 3 fights.

agreed!

[BUNGALOWS]

Hell no I don't. In my eyes PAC only lost 1 of his last 3 fights.

The only response that is correct.

[Pacquiao'd]

JMM, Mosley and Bradley had to leave their promoter to get a Pacquiao fight, Arum wants a split of everything. Not an excuse just the truth.

funny how tardnation doesnt want to admit this fact

not to mention Cotto had to leave Arum so he could ink his fight with Floyd

[-Huey-]

So you think Bradley beat Manny?

Same argument can be made with JMM-Pac 1, 2, and 3.

The record books will show a W for Bradley over Pacquiao (not that I agree) just like they will show Pac going 2-1-1-0 against Marquez (which i also disagree with)

JMM out boxed Pac in every fight and didnt get a W until he KO'd him...the record books won't show sentimental favorites or any "he was robbed against" so-so...