Comments Thread For: Hunter Likes Angulo's Chances To "Power" Past Canelo

[batista84]

Canelo fought Trout and Floyd but is scared of Lara does that make sense.

Haters gonna hate no matter what, look Canelo ain't the next floyd but the kid has skills.

1.-Canelo boxes better than Trout.
2.-Canelo has far better defense than Trout.
3.-Canelo is a better counter-puncher than Trout. he ain't gonna chase Lara all night waiting to be countered, in fact Canelo was able to counter Floyd with some crisp shots, neither of them were hard punches and neither hurted Floyd, but he was able to counter the best counter from boxing aside from Rigondeaux.
4.-Canelo is a thinker, Trout is a boxer who bases his boxing on his natural athelticism.
5.-Canelo has better footwork than Trout...............you might reply on this one, wtf are u talkin' about? yeah, don't need to be dancing in the ring all night to have good footwork, footwork is the way you use your legs to box your opponent the best you can, even tho you are flat-footed you can have a terrific foot-work, of course casual dummies can't appreciate that.


The thing here is, Canelo beated Trout by a slight margin, Lara dominated Trout, Molina (at least to me and many other beated Lara, now what whould happen if Canelo fights Molina next and knocks him out...................................you see????? Styles makes fights, the fact that Lara put on a clinic against Trout doesn't mean nothing

I'd take Canelo over Lara by KO..........yeah! you heard it from me first, Canelo KO's Lara, based on what I've seen Canelo beats Lara and any other 154lbr with the exception of Kirkland, I think Kirkland has that legendary stamina and output to put Canelo on the Canvas. thinkin Kirkland would do Canelo what Maidana did to Broner. Angulo may offer some danger too but I think Lara would do ok just a few rounds. Demetrius Andrade is another good boxer, to me better than Lara.

[twosweethooks]

Angulo has a good shot here to go head to head with Canelo

OH wait, Canelo don't like to go head to head, I forgot.

Don't you KNOW CANELO was sick while watching the Maidana Broner fight ?

Maidana showed Canelo what to do when confronted with the shoulder roll and proceeded to destroy Broner.

Canelo botched his shot at May Jr and could have taken his Nuts then his heart and made him quit but NOOOOOOOOOOOO he tried to box.

I don't think Angulo will let Canelo just lay back and box, I think Angulo will bring a war unlike the ballerina show from good ole JR.

[bambam182]

lol at all the experts on here giving career advice, you guys have never even stepped foot in a ring or even seen a live fight and here you guys are giving advice lol. however you guys will claim that you guys boxed amateur and what not. losers

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Canelo fought Trout and Floyd but is scared of Lara does that make sense.

Neither one of those two fights were a risk like fighting Lara.

I know you're a Mayweather nuthugger but people around here respect people who take risks.

Donaire fighting Rigo = a risk
Canelo fighting Lara = a risk


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Quote:

Originally Posted by dc3383

Canelo fought Trout and Floyd but is scared of Lara does that make sense.

Haters gonna hate no matter what, look Canelo ain't the next floyd but the kid has skills.

1.-Canelo boxes better than Trout.
2.-Canelo has far better defense than Trout.
3.-Canelo is a better counter-puncher than Trout. he ain't gonna chase Lara all night waiting to be countered, in fact Canelo was able to counter Floyd with some crisp shots, neither of them were hard punches and neither hurted Floyd, but he was able to counter the best counter from boxing aside from Rigondeaux.
4.-Canelo is a thinker, Trout is a boxer who bases his boxing on his natural athelticism.
5.-Canelo has better footwork than Trout...............you might reply on this one, wtf are u talkin' about? yeah, don't need to be dancing in the ring all night to have good footwork, footwork is the way you use your legs to box your opponent the best you can, even tho you are flat-footed you can have a terrific foot-work, of course casual dummies can't appreciate that.


The thing here is, Canelo beated Trout by a slight margin, Lara dominated Trout, Molina (at least to me and many other beated Lara, now what whould happen if Canelo fights Molina next and knocks him out...................................you see????? Styles makes fights, the fact that Lara put on a clinic against Trout doesn't mean nothing

I'd take Canelo over Lara by KO..........yeah! you heard it from me first, Canelo KO's Lara, based on what I've seen Canelo beats Lara and any other 154lbr with the exception of Kirkland, I think Kirkland has that legendary stamina and output to put Canelo on the Canvas. thinkin Kirkland would do Canelo what Maidana did to Broner. Angulo may offer some danger too but I think Lara would do ok just a few rounds. Demetrius Andrade is another good boxer, to me better than Lara.

All that yet more than 50% of the people had Trout winning.

All that yet Lara beat Trout easier than Canelo did. Without any controversy.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[umop-ap!sdn]

I like Angulo's chances to trump Canelo because Angulo is a pressure fighter and can apply it all night, with heavy hands. We've all seen Canelo gas in fights and take rounds off etc. Against Angulo he would pay for this. Add those rounds he takes off, + a few close rounds in favor of Angulo and we have an upset.

[icha]

people here saying canelo is ducking lara like he is on the last fight of his career and aint never going to happen, canelo is only 23 and he just fought trout and floyd back to back, and by the time canelo fought trout he was considered mare dangerous than lara for most on this forum, so by this forums logic lara is looking for a fight with a 23yo coming of a loss and that doesnt even has a strap, isnt that cherrypicking?? i want to see this fight just like i did wanted the trout fight, but to make it look like lara is canelos mandatory is wrong... i know lara has a big rea$on to fight canelo, but i dont see canelos reasons to push for this fight on his first PPV... same people calling for duck here, will come with excuses if he fights and beats lara, and will still call canelo a bum...
and many here will discredit perro as an opponent since he lost to lara, but you will also discredit molina even know that lara couldnt beat him... by the way at this points lara deserves the championship fight more than canelo, but to be asking for a money(ppv) fight he needs to at least bring a real strap or some fans and thats what he should be looking for right now..

[zuz]

no way Virlgil

pusy Canelo gotta fight Lara or Molina to getting finally exposed

dude clearly lost to Trout

letim fight Lara

[icha]

All that yet more than 50% of the people had Trout winning.

All that yet Lara beat Trout easier than Canelo did. Without any controversy.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

so you are bringing and internet poll to score a fight, but at the same time more than 50% of media experts had the fight for canelo, even trout him self recognized canelo as the faster, stronger better boxer.... if canelo beats molina without controversy doesnt mean he beats lara, same applies the other way...

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Quote:

Originally Posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.

All that yet more than 50% of the people had Trout winning.

All that yet Lara beat Trout easier than Canelo did. Without any controversy.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

so you are bringing and internet poll to score a fight, but at the same time more than 50% of media experts had the fight for canelo, even trout him self recognized canelo as the faster, stronger better boxer.... if canelo beats molina without controversy doesnt mean he beats lara, same applies the other way...

It's not a poll.

http://fightscorecollector.blogspot....ts-by.html?m=1


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android