that too.
but i think what hurt pbf/gbp was their history with arum plus pbf doesn't sound good with his rants.
hardest part of libel is to prove intent to hurt/malice.
easier to prove with gbp because of their history with Pac/Arum.
and floyd's anti-pac rants.
normally libel cases are unwinnable.
but how hard is it to believe pbf want to hurt the rep of his p4p rival? a guy he posts streams talking crap about?
is it that unbelievable that gbp would try to hurt their #1 rival's top fighter? a fighter who they signed before but couldn't keep?
but i think what hurt pbf/gbp was their history with arum plus pbf doesn't sound good with his rants.
hardest part of libel is to prove intent to hurt/malice.
easier to prove with gbp because of their history with Pac/Arum.
and floyd's anti-pac rants.
normally libel cases are unwinnable.
but how hard is it to believe pbf want to hurt the rep of his p4p rival? a guy he posts streams talking crap about?
is it that unbelievable that gbp would try to hurt their #1 rival's top fighter? a fighter who they signed before but couldn't keep?
Comment