fmj has no plans to meet with manny

[Marvellous1]

Sorry, but I don't know if people actually watched the interview, but there was nothing but common sense and views from a pretty respectable perspective (a first for Mayweather, I know. Believe me, I was surprised). He talked about how nosensical it is that people were writing Pacquiao off as close to retirement one minute and after beating a pretty limited non-welterweight, in Rios, he's all of a sudden back to where he was before a razor thin decision against Marquez in the thrid fight. Mayweather talks about the motivation for any possible action Pacquiao might be taking (according to rumours) and takesit all with a pinch of salt.

I didn't hear him saying he "didn't want to meet Pacquiao ever" or that he wouldn't consider ever consider a fight. Just that right now, there doesn't seem to be as much to gain considering Pacquiao's current run as a welterweight. Pretty much what he said about Mosley, which idiots immediately translated to fear, only to pretty much confirm what Mayweather said by not giving credit him for beating Mosley ("Old Mosley" I believe is the term). Before you say it- I want to see this fight, but how anyone got cowardice from that vid is beyond me. At least Mayweather shows respect for what it takes to get in a ring, unlike people on this forum.... who claim to be boxing fans. Go figure.

[torosboxing75]

Why does Pac have to avenge his lost to Bradley but Khan doesn't have to avenge any of his loses. And lets not forget the Bradley fight was like the robbery of the year and Pac was beating Marquez to a pulp before he lunged into that punch.

[johnm is...]

LOL. A bunch of people that read the thread title and didn't watch the video/read the article.

[boxingfeind]

lmfao! khan is more of a lightweight than rios, rios fought at 147 khan last fought at 143. floyd sounds dum as sht

Floyd never even said he`s fighting khan next;some writer looking for hits on his website claimed that Floyd agreed to fight Khan,and a lot of you just ran with it lol.Floyd already said he don`t know whose he`s fighting next-and he said he`ll let his team pick for him-and he said if its Khan its Khan,if its Pacquiao its Pacquiao.

[torosboxing75]

lmfao! khan is more of a lightweight than rios, rios fought at 147 khan last fought at 143. floyd sounds dum as sht

I don't think anybody contradicts them self more then Floyd in any sport period

[DuttyAlacrity]

I read that article and FIghthype don`t know for sure if Floyd is considering Pacquiao or not-because Mayweather didn`t outright say "i`m not interested in meeting Pacquiao".All Mayweather said was:"here`s a guy that`s 1 and 2 in his last 4 fights and after he got ko`ed by Marquez people was saying he was done,then after Pacquiao beat a lightweight,people is now saying is ready for a slick welterweight".That`s not the same thing as saying well i`m not interested in meeting Pacquiao.What Floyd said is pretty vague as far as if he`ll fight Pacquiao next or not;it could be taken anyway.Floyd said it himself that for his next fight:If its PAcquiao its Pacquiao,if its khan its Khan".That means he `s not ruling Pacquiao out for his next fight.

Take it easy buddy you're using waaaay too much logic to be on NSB. Take all that logic and reason some where else. This forum is for crying and name calling bruh.

[MindBat]

Sorry, but I don't know if people actually watched the interview, but there was nothing but common sense and views from a pretty respectable perspective (a first for Mayweather, I know. Believe me, I was surprised). He talked about how nosensical it is that people were writing Pacquiao off as close to retirement one minute and after beating a pretty limited non-welterweight, in Rios, he's all of a sudden back to where he was before a razor thin decision against Marquez in the thrid fight. Mayweather talks about the motivation for any possible action Pacquiao might be taking (according to rumours) and takesit all with a pinch of salt.

I didn't hear him saying he "didn't want to meet Pacquiao ever" or that he wouldn't consider ever consider a fight. Just that right now, there doesn't seem to be as much to gain considering Pacquiao's current run as a welterweight. Pretty much what he said about Mosley, which idiots immediately translated to fear, only to pretty much confirm what Mayweather said by not giving credit him for beating Mosley ("Old Mosley" I believe is the term). Before you say it- I want to see this fight, but how anyone got cowardice from that vid is beyond me. At least Mayweather shows respect for what it takes to get in a ring, unlike people on this forum.... who claim to be boxing fans. Go figure.

Floyd haters will always find a way to twist the facts to no avail. They've been doing it since '09.

.

[arizashakes]

Even more so after seeing the fallout of broner losing he'll be even more shook to lose

[boxingfeind]

Take it easy buddy you're using waaaay too much logic to be on NSB. Take all that logic and reason some where else. This forum is for crying and name calling bruh.

If its too much for you to handle then don`t read my post,go read GGG is god post instead.

[Marvellous1]

Why does Pac have to avenge his lost to Bradley but Khan doesn't have to avenge any of his loses. And lets not forget the Bradley fight was like the robbery of the year and Pac was beating Marquez to a pulp before he lunged into that punch.

LOL at the "Pac was winning..... until he lost" excuse. I never heard George Foreman use it, or Michael Moorer or Herol Graham.........

Seriously though. I'd apply the same argument to Khan because I can't stand his sense of entitlement and don't think he deserves a fight with Mayweather. But it's as obvious as Tuesday coming after Monday, that beating Pacquiao on a good run gets you more credit than beating him on a bad run. Heck, Mayweather whooped Mosley after he smashed Margarito to bits and people still don't give him full credit for it. This would be no different.