Why Broner is a B- fighter!

[esl_4_u]

For those who have a real good boxing IQ, here is why Broner is a B minus fighter...at best!

1. Doesn't understand the science of the shoulder roll offense and defense. Similar to another copier (not Master) of the style, Mickey Bey. Both of these guys lack the basic fundamentals of the shoulder roll.

2. Doesn't create offense - He's has no effective offensive gameplan and he doesn't create offense for himself.

3. Doesn't use basic boxing fundamentals when in a jam. When things aren't working right go back to basics - jab, jab, right cross - jab, jab, right cross left hook - jab head & body - slips, faints & slip/faint counters

4. No real threat in terms of power at current weight.

5. Doesn't match up well with any of the belt holders. Paulie beat him and exposed his flaws - it wasn't just a bad day he just isn't that good!

[SlySlickSmooth]

My thoughts too, where is his ****ing jab?

He sits there thinking he could be Willie Pep or some ****. A resourceful jab for him is nonexistant.

This loss should be a huge wake up call, I am sure he didn't expect the fight to go this way at all.

[kardsufur]

For those who have a real good boxing IQ, here is why Broner is a B minus fighter...at best!

1. Doesn't understand the science of the shoulder roll offense and defense. Similar to another copier (not Master) of the style, Mickey Bey. Both of these guys lack the basic fundamentals of the shoulder roll.

2. Doesn't create offense - He's has no effective offensive gameplan and he doesn't create offense for himself.

3. Doesn't use basic boxing fundamentals when in a jam. When things aren't working right go back to basics - jab, jab, right cross - jab, jab, right cross left hook - jab head & body - slips, faints & slip/faint counters

4. No real threat in terms of power at current weight.

5. Doesn't match up well with any of the belt holders. Paulie beat him and exposed his flaws - it wasn't just a bad day he just isn't that good!

great break down and post