Titles Dropped From Hopkin - Eastman Contest

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • borikua
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2004
    • 12530
    • 686
    • 745
    • 20,193

    #1

    Titles Dropped From Hopkin - Eastman Contest

    Howard Eastman will not become undisputed middleweight champion even if he beats current kingpin Bernard Hopkins next month, his promoter has revealed.

    Londoner Eastman will get a long-awaited shot at Hopkins in Los Angeles on February 19 but after initially announcing the WBA, IBF, WBO and WBC titles would be up for grabs, Mick Hennessy has announced only the latter will be on the line.

    Hennessy Sports had said all four belts would be contended, following an announcement by American pay-per-view broadcaster HBO.

    "We would like to apologise for this misunderstanding," said Hennessy. "It was never our intention to mislead anybody.

    "Our understanding at the time of our announcement was that all the championships would be contested.

    "We have since learnt, however, that Bernard Hopkins is only prepared to stake the WBC title he has been mandated to defend.

    "If this situation changes we will keep everybody updated.

    "This is no way detracts from the fight."

    Fans of the Battersea Bomber will agree, as the boxing public's desire to see often meaningless titles ignored in order to see the big fights continues to grow.

    Glen Johnson and Antonio Tarver ditched their light-heavyweight belts in December to free themselves from mandatory defences and meet each other to establish the division's true champion - Johnson won the battle of Roy Jones' conquerors on points.

    "At the end of the day the two best middleweights in the world are facing each other and that is what counts," said Hennessy.

    Hopkins, 40, forced a stoppage of Oscar de la Hoya in their high-profile meeting last year and is looking to cement his position as one of the greatest middleweights of all time - while Eastman (40-1) will be determined to win his first world crown.

    The 34-year-old lost controversially on points to William Joppy in 2001 when they met for the vacant WBA title in Las Vegas.
  • Chups
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2004
    • 18400
    • 1,835
    • 1,281
    • 52,879

    #2
    At least a belt is on the line.

    Comment

    • ChicoEscuelaNYC
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Mar 2004
      • 305
      • 59
      • 269
      • 9,214

      #3
      Wow, that really sucks. I wonder who's behind it. Hopkins?

      Comment

      • jabsRstiff
        ! ! ! !
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2004
        • 8964
        • 498
        • 136
        • 16,167

        #4
        Who cares if no paper titles are at stake ?

        Should Eastman beat Hopkins, everyone but the corrupt sanctioning bodies will recognize him as champ.

        Comment

        • borikua
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jul 2004
          • 12530
          • 686
          • 745
          • 20,193

          #5
          Is Hopkins scared? Has he done this b4?

          Comment

          • trinidadpr87
            They Made Me Do It
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2004
            • 2240
            • 174
            • 357
            • 8,903

            #6
            Originally posted by borikua
            Is Hopkins scared? Has he done this b4?
            in case he loses he wants to have some left for tito to take. j/k

            Comment

            • Kimmy
              Umpalumpa Police
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2004
              • 3241
              • 168
              • 63
              • 10,090

              #7
              bull****. The reason Hopkins has done this is he has to pay sanctioning fees to the boxing organisations. If only the WBC title is at stake then he only pays the WBC the sanctioning fee, this will mean more money off the top for both Eastman and Hopkins. This is a very intelligent move and i can`t remember it being done before but very very clever. I slaute Hopkins for his guile!

              Comment

              • The1God
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Aug 2004
                • 941
                • 80
                • 66
                • 7,579

                #8
                Originally posted by jabsRstiff
                Who cares if no paper titles are at stake ?

                Should Eastman beat Hopkins, everyone but the corrupt sanctioning bodies will recognize him as champ.
                The Ring and the fans will determine who the True Champion is. I never excepted Tarver as P4P after Ko-ing RJJ, Klitchko is the best of the top even though he only has one belt. If Eastman KOs B Hopkins, he will be the "Peoples" Champ. These sanctioning bodies are greedy jerk-offs. They are slowly running themselves out of boxing. It will be good for the WBC though, it will be THE recognized belt.

                So, if B. Hopkins wins, he retains all the belts, but if somebody beats him, the titles are vacant????

                Comment

                • Eyeh8you
                  \/\/.B.C HIER0PHA/\/T
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 1081
                  • 57
                  • 19
                  • 7,425

                  #9
                  Originally posted by trinidadpr87
                  in case he loses he wants to have some left for tito to take. j/k
                  He aint gonna lose to this never was. B-Hop mops Tito again. Not enough skill to execute the executioner!

                  Comment

                  • abdiel2k3
                    El Terrible
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 6719
                    • 575
                    • 624
                    • 24,507

                    #10
                    its true that belts have become pretty meaningless as of late
                    but when only one belt is on the line
                    it doesnt exactly seem to exude confidence from hopkins or his peoples stand point
                    id rather have him risk them all
                    or not risk em at all
                    as in droppen the titles
                    we all know hes the best anyways

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP