How is it unique? AB told the fans to pick his next opponent in the Paulie postfight interview. And according the that poll, he's fighting the top picked available guy. He's not getting his balls massaged for it. So exactly what's so good about this accept folks trying to turn this kid into the lastest "anti-current climate" bull**** they've created in their minds?
Dude, you're thinking WAY too hard on something that's pretty simple to grasp.
Thurman said something that gets him hyped up, and gives off a mentality that he leaves it all in the ring, and he's willing to take on whoever. People think it's awesome that a guy has that type of mentality, and actually says it.
You're in here pissed off for whatever reason. Let it go, man. It's not that serious.
And stop comparing people. Broner's in a certain lane, because Broner chose that lane.
Dude, you're thinking WAY too hard on something that's pretty simple to grasp.
Thurman said something that gets him hyped up, and gives off a mentality that he leaves it all in the ring, and he's willing to take on whoever. People think it's awesome that a guy has that type of mentality, and actually says it.
You're in here pissed off for whatever reason. Let it go, man. It's not that serious.
And stop comparing people. Broner's in a certain lane, because Broner chose that lane.
How am I pissed off? Its a discussion forum. I'm discussing the subject. My opinion just doesn't line up with the majority, which is where debate comes in. I don't see how someone can take that I'm mad.
As for comparing, why not? It just shows a double standard. I attempt to look at everyone through the same lense. Which is probably rare.
Looks like he has two arms to me.
Anyways, you also picked Berto to beat Ortiz and Guerrero.
I notice a pattern here.
I don't even make too many fight picks. So I really don't know who I picked when. Its awesome you keep up with that sort of thing. As for you "looks like he had two arms." Ignorant
How am I pissed off? Its a discussion forum. I'm discussing the subject. My opinion just doesn't line up with the majority, which is where debate comes in. I don't see how someone can take that I'm mad.
As for comparing, why not? It just shows a double standard. I attempt to look at everyone through the same lense. Which is probably rare.
You can't bull **** a bull ****ter. It's OK, you don't like the fact that people are praising Thurman. We get it.
Trying to play all "but, I'm merely here to debate on this serious matter, my kind sir" face ass.
Comment