Who was the greater ameteur Guillermo Rigondeux or Vasyl Lomachenko?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BendOver
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2013
    • 2251
    • 211
    • 939
    • 12,497

    #11
    Originally posted by New England
    they are two of the greatest amateurs ever. the amateurs are very different from the way they once were. these guys [especially from cuba and former soviet countries] fight amateur into adulthood. when you're as little as those guys, you are in your prime as an amateur.


    historically, an american amateur in the HW or LHW division wouldn't even be in the "man strength" years by the time he turned pro. guys would turn pro young to make money, even if it meant taking some losses early in your career.

    a 132 or 125 lber will be at his physical peak in his early 20's. these guys were still amateurs at that time.
    And yet Rigondeaux is doing pretty well past his prime at the pro level...

    Comment

    • PainfromUkraine
      The Takeover
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2013
      • 2725
      • 348
      • 283
      • 10,024

      #12
      Both equally impressive, interesting comparison with two vastly different boxing schools...both fought the best competition available in the ams and were almost flawless, for personal preference Vasyl for me slightly (for obvious reasons) but with no bias pretty much equal in terms of dominance/accomplishments etc. Looking forward to a meeting in the pros soon!

      Comment

      • .:: JSFD26 ::.
        Brawski
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2012
        • 33329
        • 725
        • 432
        • 44,762

        #13
        Originally posted by BendOver
        Quote:

        Originally Posted by New England

        they are two of the greatest amateurs ever. the amateurs are very different from the way they once were. these guys [especially from cuba and former soviet countries] fight amateur into adulthood. when you're as little as those guys, you are in your prime as an amateur.


        historically, an american amateur in the HW or LHW division wouldn't even be in the "man strength" years by the time he turned pro. guys would turn pro young to make money, even if it meant taking some losses early in your career.

        a 132 or 125 lber will be at his physical peak in his early 20's. these guys were still amateurs at that time.

        And yet Rigondeaux is doing pretty well past his prime at the pro level...
        I think the reason why Rigo is still razor sharp is cause he doesn't take much damage and (most importantly IMO) he doesnt balloon up between fights. Just like Mayweather, he stays around fight night weight.


        Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

        Comment

        • Russian Crushin
          atheist with a gun
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 33788
          • 1,472
          • 836
          • 46,625

          #14
          Both have 2 Olympic golds and 2 amateur champ golds, but lomachenko has a silver in a 3rd amateur champion ship when rigo didn't even medal in his 3rd.....so clearly it loma

          Also he only lost once and avenged it, has rigo beaten every person he has ever faced? Didn't think so

          Comment

          • DannYankee
            Evil Empire
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 7066
            • 338
            • 207
            • 17,249

            #15
            RIgondeaux faced tougher opposition and won gold in every single major tournament so it's that good old question do you take quality or quantity?


            Originally posted by Russian Crushin
            Both have 2 Olympic golds and 2 amateur champ golds, but lomachenko has a silver in a 3rd amateur champion ship when rigo didn't even medal in his 3rd.....so clearly it loma

            Also he only lost once and avenged it, has rigo beaten every person he has ever faced? Didn't think so
            You are sorely mistaken Rigo wasn't in the 2007 Championships because it was in chicago us = no Cuba coming Rigo got gold medal in all the major events he competed. Lomachenko didnt compete in as many therefore his amateur wins arent against as tough opposition. RIgo only gets gold so actually that silver you mention makes Loma look bad Rigo would been like ew silver lol.
            Last edited by DannYankee; 12-12-2013, 08:18 PM.

            Comment

            • torosboxing75
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2012
              • 4070
              • 120
              • 122
              • 10,783

              #16
              Lets just get these two in the ring for 2014
              Nonito can watch and learn

              Comment

              • Russian Crushin
                atheist with a gun
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 33788
                • 1,472
                • 836
                • 46,625

                #17
                Originally posted by DannYankee09
                RIgondeaux faced tougher opposition and won gold in every single major tournament so it's that good old question do you take quality or quantity?
                He did not win gold in every tourney doe

                Comment

                • torosboxing75
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2012
                  • 4070
                  • 120
                  • 122
                  • 10,783

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Russian Crushin
                  Both have 2 Olympic golds and 2 amateur champ golds, but lomachenko has a silver in a 3rd amateur champion ship when rigo didn't even medal in his 3rd.....so clearly it loma

                  Also he only lost once and avenged it, has rigo beaten every person he has ever faced? Didn't think so
                  I'm pretty sure the Cuban amateurs have better skilled competition.

                  Comment

                  • DannYankee
                    Evil Empire
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 7066
                    • 338
                    • 207
                    • 17,249

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Russian Crushin
                    He did not win gold in every tourney doe
                    Everybody gets robbed once in a while ask Lomachenko actually ask Floyd dude got blatantly robbed in the olympics.

                    Comment

                    • Russian Crushin
                      atheist with a gun
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 33788
                      • 1,472
                      • 836
                      • 46,625

                      #20
                      Originally posted by dannyankee09
                      rigondeaux faced tougher opposition and won gold in every single major tournament so it's that good old question do you take quality or quantity?




                      You are sorely mistaken rigo wasn't in the 2007 championships because it was in chicago us = no cuba coming rigo got gold medal in all the major events he competed. Lomachenko didnt compete in as many therefore his amateur wins arent against as tough opposition. Rigo only gets gold so actually that silver you mention makes loma look bad rigo would been like ew silver Lol.
                      2003.......

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP