...or wins in general? For example, if you have a purse dispute over whether it's going to be 50/50, 60/40, 40/60, etc...do negotiations ever end up in a compromise where the winner gets the lion's share of the money? I understand that corrupt judges don't make this easy if the fight goes to the scorecards, by why not specify that the win must take place by KO/TKO? Wouldn't this create more competitive fights? Does this ever happen in contracts?
Do fight contracts ever incentivize KO's?
Collapse
-
...or wins in general? For example, if you have a purse dispute over whether it's going to be 50/50, 60/40, 40/60, etc...do negotiations ever end up in a compromise where the winner gets the lion's share of the money? I understand that corrupt judges don't make this easy if the fight goes to the scorecards, by why not specify that the win must take place by KO/TKO? Wouldn't this create more competitive fights? Does this ever happen in contracts? -
I remember something like this being said for Hopkins vs Joppy years back. I don't know if there was absolute truth to it though.Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment