Comments Thread For: Lara: Canelo is an Easy Win For Me, No Problem

[Mr. Philadel]

Please stop with all the "running" talk. It's the ******est argument one can use in a boxing discussion. How does one run from another man in the confines of a boxing ring with ropes? He has nowhere to go that his opponent can't, it's not like the fkn Hunger Games. It's a damn boxing match and the other guy is right there a step or two away. If he backs up, move forward, he goes left you shimmy right. If he punches while you try to come in, do something about it! Block, parry, dodge or sway and counter, that's what a fighter is supposed to do. Don't be a *****, take a jab to give a shot. All the opponent has to do is "box" if he can do so well enough and create opportunities to land. If Angulo could knock Lara down and hurt him the way he did than why would it be considered running if Canelo doesn't have the skill set or balls like Angulo did to take the fight to Lara? All it would mean is that Canelo was't good enough, just like he wasn't good enough to fight Mayweather. A lot of you are on some real amateur hour nonsense. Only running going on is y'all running your mouths bout $h!t you don't know much about.

OMFG!!!....realest **** I've read in a while

[GoldenGloveLove]

Guess what. We already know who Sulaiman thinks would win!

[DannYankee]

Please stop with all the "running" talk. It's the ******est argument one can use in a boxing discussion. How does one run from another man in the confines of a boxing ring with ropes? He has nowhere to go that his opponent can't, it's not like the fkn Hunger Games. It's a damn boxing match and the other guy is right there a step or two away. If he backs up, move forward, he goes left you shimmy right. If he punches while you try to come in, do something about it! Block, parry, dodge or sway and counter, that's what a fighter is supposed to do. Don't be a *****, take a jab to give a shot. All the opponent has to do is "box" if he can do so well enough and create opportunities to land. If Angulo could knock Lara down and hurt him the way he did than why would it be considered running if Canelo doesn't have the skill set or balls like Angulo did to take the fight to Lara? All it would mean is that Canelo was't good enough, just like he wasn't good enough to fight Mayweather. A lot of you are on some real amateur hour nonsense. Only running going on is y'all running your mouths bout $h!t you don't know much about.

Post of the year candidate i should copy and paste this **** every time someone tries to whine because they are butthurt the fighter they support wouldn't beat a more skilled one. Like moving side to side is a fking sin "please sir may you stand still so my punches can hit you in the face?" GTFOH .

[RawDawgHasSpokn]

Canelo will only take this fight if its his only choice. That Cotto ship is about to sail away and there's no sense in a Trout rematch. He may go the Angulo route but a win against Lara would prove he belongs to be held in the high regard that he is today. That being said, Lara "Rodney King's" Canelo for 12 rounds. UD

[mannyman]

This is what i like to see. Fighters calling each other out.

[Atsui des]

After he beats Canelo maybe his fanbase will grow to 8 , but that still doesn't take away the fact that he will spank Canelos"s asssss.
Also , lets say he did lose to Molina, ran from Vanes and got dropped by Angulo. That in itself says a lot about the man win or lose, willing to face all the top competition including Trout which he spanked. Compare that to Canelo whose resume only consist of Trout and a bunch of over the hill fighters and 140lbrs fighting Canelo out of their division.

Fact about what ? Fact that you are a lara fans. Beating trout in a boring fest insomnia killer doesnt suddenly make him a top notch. Canelo has more decent win than lara and boxing fans has a good impression on his fight and thats why he has so many fanbase.lara still have a lot of thing to prove to claim himself an elite.which being dropped twice and being life and death with B fighter is the best way to move you away from the elite status.which is a FACT !!!

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Quote:

Originally Posted by hurricanelu

After he beats Canelo maybe his fanbase will grow to 8 , but that still doesn't take away the fact that he will spank Canelos"s asssss.
Also , lets say he did lose to Molina, ran from Vanes and got dropped by Angulo. That in itself says a lot about the man win or lose, willing to face all the top competition including Trout which he spanked. Compare that to Canelo whose resume only consist of Trout and a bunch of over the hill fighters and 140lbrs fighting Canelo out of their division.

Fact about what ? Fact that you are a lara fans. Beating trout in a boring fest insomnia killer doesnt suddenly make him a top notch. Canelo has more decent win than lara and boxing fans has a good impression on his fight and thats why he has so many fanbase.lara still have a lot of thing to prove to claim himself an elite.which being dropped twice and being life and death with B fighter is the best way to move you away from the elite status.which is a FACT !!!

List them mofoka! Fkin list them dawg!



Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[-PBP-]

Please stop with all the "running" talk. It's the ******est argument one can use in a boxing discussion. How does one run from another man in the confines of a boxing ring with ropes? He has nowhere to go that his opponent can't, it's not like the fkn Hunger Games. It's a damn boxing match and the other guy is right there a step or two away. If he backs up, move forward, he goes left you shimmy right. If he punches while you try to come in, do something about it! Block, parry, dodge or sway and counter, that's what a fighter is supposed to do. Don't be a *****, take a jab to give a shot. All the opponent has to do is "box" if he can do so well enough and create opportunities to land. If Angulo could knock Lara down and hurt him the way he did than why would it be considered running if Canelo doesn't have the skill set or balls like Angulo did to take the fight to Lara? All it would mean is that Canelo was't good enough, just like he wasn't good enough to fight Mayweather. A lot of you are on some real amateur hour nonsense. Only running going on is y'all running your mouths bout $h!t you don't know much about.

Good post.

[Atsui des]

Just browse to boxrec you ****in idiot.you can see which one had better name on the list unless you are a blind hater or just start watch boxing a week ago.****in moron

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Just browse to boxrec you ****in idiot.you can see which one had better name on the list unless you are a blind hater or just start watch boxing a week ago.****in moron

I don't need boxrec mah dood.

Canelo's only legit "win" was Trout and he needed controversy to win it.

Lara has Paul Williams, Angulo and Trout. Should've had Vanes too had it not been a TR event.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android